no surprise ppl have nothing to say on this
the truth always goes unnoticed by untrained minds
thekingsmen said:Figures DaFunk would troll his response instead of making an actual intelligent one.
That video trolls common sense.
thekingsmen said:A troll would know...
You need to stop making, bumbling, convoluted, poorly-reasoned assertions then telling people they don't have reading comprehension because they responded as a reasonable person would to them.once again your reading comprehension has failed.
my stance in the post you quoted was that the suspicious behavior of the US government in regards to the 9/11 investigation left the door open for all these so-called conspiracies.
i didn't even name the conspiracies nor did i take a position in regards to such conspiracies. you're making false assumptions as per the usual.
That's not established fact that the government knew about the attacks beforehand. What are you talking about? Proof?read carefully:
my position is this... i think the govt knew about the attacks beforehand (already established as fact) and allowed it to happen in order to capitalize on the aftermath (my speculation)... and capitalize they did.
im unsure about the whole controlled demolition aspect, although from the evidence presented this theory seems much more applicable to building 7 than the twin towers.
Lol..."fell like controlled demolitions" as opposed to what? Lol@skyscrapers "falling naturally." Where they do that at?but i do think it's suspicious that all three buildings fell in a way that mimic controlled demolitions. i would be interested to research prior cases in history where buildings fell naturally, for whatever reason, in a way that closely resembles controlled demolitions. i would bet there aren't many, but yet three such cases happened on 9/11.
m also taking into account this is the BUSH ADMINISTRATION we're talking about here...probably the biggest government criminal organization the US has ever seen. they are known liars, deceivers, murderers, and exploiters... so there's plenty of motive and plenty of opportunity in that regard.
other than that, im in a state of suspended judgement until i have more concrete information. i havent read the 9/11 commission report, or the follow up book by the committee, or analyzed all the evidence, etc., and frankly neither have yall. the difference is the psuedo skeptic crew has taken a firm stance on all these issues, and it just so happens you all believe everything the government is telling you in regards to 9/11.
so if you're going to address me, address these specific points, and leave your assumptions out of it.
YOU sure would.....
And I'm not gonna take anyone seriously if they believe it wasn't possible for people on the flights to make cell phone calls........like that quack Chossudovsky.
thekingsmen said:Wow the man has better credentials and can break down things critically in his articles and books.
He's an authority on economics, not on cell phones.