The uncomfortable moment when Noam Chomsky gives 9/11 twoofers 7 minutes of ether
- Thread starter Dusty Bake Activate
- Start date
believe that you can knock down 3 buildings with 2 planes breh
Armies should just use planes instead of long range missile
I read the page, and google searched the author. it's written by a dude that manages a website
ya real credible. he doesn't have any degrees. and that company doesn't even do demolitions. they are "vibration consultants"
http://www.protecservices.com/Services.php
Last edited:
what I posted from the nist report proved my point. building 7 hit free fall speeds as it collapsed.
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,063
- Reputation
- 8,154
- Daps
- 122,283
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Ill Clinton said:what I posted from the nist report proved my point. building 7 hit free fall speeds as it collapsed.
That doesn't prove the building collapsed at free-fall speed you total inept fool. Falling at free-fall for a second doesn't mean the same thing as you nutjobs keep trying to claim.
Also, the NIST report made it quite clear as to why that occurred since part of the middle support columns had been destroyed leaving 10-15 foot gaps which are perfectly in-line with the report and all laws of Physics.
Like I said, you aren't smart enough to understand what you linked and have destroyed your own argument.
The building fell at LESS THAN FREE-FALL SPEED since it took longer to collapse than it would have had it been a free-fall.
Also, the NIST report made it quite clear as to why that occurred since part of the middle support columns had been destroyed leaving 10-15 foot gaps which are perfectly in-line with the report and all laws of Physics.
Like I said, you aren't smart enough to understand what you linked and have destroyed your own argument.
The building fell at LESS THAN FREE-FALL SPEED since it took longer to collapse than it would have had it been a free-fall.
Last edited:
how come all of those "engineers" aren't in structural fields? and why does that list also include people with bachelors degrees?
how come all of those "engineers" aren't in structural fields? and why does that list also include people with bachelors degrees?
Are you referring to this page??http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/ae.html
There are M.A., M.S., B.A., B.S., Ph.Ds ...... tthere are architects, engineers (all kinds), etc etc ....and they have AIA and FAIA which are further licensing you get post graduation ........ :dahell are you talking about???
Do yourself a favor, go to that link, locate the "Find" button on your screen ... type in the words "structure" or "structural" and see how many experts have a structural aspect in their education background you find??
Last edited:
TLOL is back
Pro
Are you referring to this page??http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/ae.html
There are M.A., M.S., B.A., B.S., Ph.Ds ...... tthere are architects, engineers (all kinds), etc etc ....and they have AIA and FAIA which are further licensing you get post graduation ........ :dahell are you talking about???
Do yourself a favor, go to that link, locate the "Find" button on your screen ... type in the words "structure" or "structural" and see how many experts have a structural aspect in their education background you find??
I just did.
Google Chrome informed me that out of the 2,000 signatures, "structural" only came up 43 times and "structure" once
Edit: The full list it comes up a little more, but not by much at all...
Are you referring to this page??http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/ae.html
There are M.A., M.S., B.A., B.S., Ph.Ds ...... tthere are architects, engineers (all kinds), etc etc ....and they have AIA and FAIA which are further licensing you get post graduation ........ :dahell are you talking about???
Do yourself a favor, go to that link, locate the "Find" button on your screen ... type in the words "structure" or "structural" and see how many experts have a structural aspect in their education background you find??
the fact is, not all of those people are in the field of construction nor do all or even most of them have the certifications you claim they do.
They let anyone sign up for that list without cross checking their credentials.
Its sheer appeal to authority (fallacy)
....and its an EVEN bigger leap since none of them were actually there or worked on the investigation.
The ONLY argument I could ever have towards the 9/11 Commission done by congress was the complaints from those who worked on it who said they were unhappy with how it was handled.
Outside of that, (and i've been through all the conspiracies and back) is the fact that there are no truly convincing arguments outside of the official story.
I really completely believed ALL of that controlled demo shyt until I realized that I really didn't know what the hell I was talking about.
ok .. good ... you said there were none .... ... that's also 1,450 "engineers" on the page .... . what's the threshold?:??
... if you want to go and cross check (as if they didn't check the credentials 
), knowing people would have no problem trying to out themIf you want to cross check them, go for it .... the investigation is wide open, all the information that was made "available" was released and allowed to be viewed, they know how to look at data and go through the scientific method, just like those that actually worked on site or dealt with the material ..... what else do you need?? ....
Are you an architect, engineer, physicists, or in the aviation industry??????
I'm trying to figure out why you think they are not just as competent as anybody else?? just b/se they have a different viewpoint, somehow they can't perform in competent profesional capacity?? ... doesn't even make sense..
Last edited:
I'm not...and neither are all of those "engineers"
If you want to cross check them, go for it .... the investigation is wide open, all the information that was made "available", what else do you need ....
Are you an architect, engineer, physicists, or in the aviation industry??????
Its been said for YEARS and ya'll keep parroting that bullshyt point.
They just let ANYONE sign up on that list.
I'm not...and neither are all of those "engineers"
Its been said for YEARS and ya'll keep parroting that bullshyt point.
They just let ANYONE sign up on that list.
proof????????????????????? I'll wait .....
and if somebody(ies) snuck on this list, and was outed does that take away from the professional opinion on the matter of the other 2,100 professionals??? ....
Motherfockers make up their credentials all the time in all areas of life, ....
I don't believe everything the government says either, but why are people so focused on disproving this when they just hit the wall of evidence like the rest of us?
Most conspiracies you even know of were revealed AFTER the fact.
Very rarely, if ever, have conspiracies been actually proven outside of Gary Webb and Iran Contra maybe.
Most conspiracies you even know of were revealed AFTER the fact.
Very rarely, if ever, have conspiracies been actually proven outside of Gary Webb and Iran Contra maybe.
proof????????????????????? I'll wait .....
and somebody(ies) snuck on this list, and was outed does that take away from the professional opinion on the matter of the other 2,100 professionals ....
Motherfockers make up their credentials all the time in all areas of life, ....
Well thats not good enough. Just admit you care more about credentials than credibility.
Their opinion is moot if they all wanna claim to represent them being people who work with construction and shyt...
you telling me an environmental or a biochemical engineer is versed in all aspects of building design
