Without even watching the video, I wanna say that I've pretty much resigned myself to the fact that "social media and virtual reality destroy every civilization just as it's getting off the ground" is a very plausible solution to the paradox.
The UFO/UAP disclosure thread
- Thread starter Agent Mulder
- Start date
Without even watching the video, I wanna say that I've pretty much resigned myself to the fact that "social media and virtual reality destroy every civilization just as it's getting off the ground" is a very plausible solution to the paradox.
Scientists are baffled, breh...
What?
First we had black and white still photos.
Then we got color photos.
Then we started getting some film.
Then we started getting videotape quality from ppl with home cameras.
Then we started getting more photos from disposable cameras and even more video.
Then we started getting phone camera videos.
Then we started getting fighter pilot/military videos.
The quality, context, reputable sources, and amount of videos have ABSOLUTELY increased from the old black and white still frames of the 50's to the color photos and videos we now have on a weekly basis from ppl across the planet. To claim otherwise is a straight up unnecessary blatant lie
But you want HD close-up photos of objects maneuvering at heights and speeds that NASA, the Navy and the Airforce can't explain
We get it Rhakim. Little green men need to knock on your door and show some form of intergalactic identification before you take any of this seriously.
What?
First we had black and white still photos.
Then we got color photos.
Then we started getting some film.
Then we started getting videotape quality from ppl with home cameras.
Then we started getting more photos from disposable cameras and even more video.
Then we started getting phone camera videos.
Then we started getting fighter pilot/military videos.
The quality, context, reputable sources, and amount of videos have ABSOLUTELY increased from the old black and white still frames of the 50's to the color photos and videos we now have on a weekly basis from ppl across the planet. To claim otherwise is a straight up unnecessary blatant lie
Breh, you just exactly proved my point.
Our technology has improved from shytty black-and-white cameras with no zoom, to the nicest fukking cameras available and even military. But what's the actual quality of the images?
1950 UFO image:
1951:
1952:
Now, after 70 years and vastly improved technology? We're all the way up to:
If you have seen better images, I'd love to see them.
But the truth is, there's a clear limit on how clear UFO images can be. Because if they were too clear, it would be obvious that they weren't UFOs. Either the method of fakery would be too clear, or the actual real-life object would be too visible.
Exact same shyt is true with Bigfoot. Even though 100x more folk carry cameras in the forest than ever before, and even though those cameras are 100x better, and even though amateur wildlife photography has improved by 100-fold, Bigfoot photos are now blurrier than ever before. Because if they were any sharper, it would be obvious that it wasn't bigfoot.
Propaganda
Superstar
the article is quite interesting.
I'm intrigued by the 12 or more statement. That was a very specific number
What did I just read ...
Your source verifying this top-secret government information, on his own authority, is "Matt Ford". From the comments:
A TV lighting guy / political blogger.
I wouldn't be surprised if they have 12+ craft that that guy knows about. But how does he know they're alien, and not just spy planes and drones from other countries?
One huge warning sign:
"Some" of the the tech is very "cutting edge"? Really? We're talking about fukking interstellar aliens, ALL of the tech should be LIGHT YEARS beyond us, not "some" and "cutting edge".
Imagine showing a Me-262 Schwalbe (1940s tech) to someone in 1904. They wouldn't say, "This is very cutting edge." They would say, there is no way this is from our planet". Or think of showing a 1990s smartphone to someone using vaccuum tube computers. They wouldn't even be able to begin to comprehend it, it would be so far beyond the technology that had been built.
And that's just jumping 30-40 years in the future, on our own planet. These aliens have been flying across the galaxy for decades, and yet their tech just looks like cutting-edge Earth tech?
Also, we're going back to the issue that the USA is recovering such craft, and also Russia and China....why not every other country on Earth? And ALL of them have kept the secret until now?
So they have 1500 scientists evaluating these UAPs. Let's say 1480 just think they're regular enemy tech, but 20 come to believe they're alien tech, and 7-8 of those 20 speak up. This entire kerflaffle could be being driven by 1% of the involved people who happen to be conspiracy minded and just to conclusions a bit too easily.
Majestyx
Duck Season
shyt is getting real behold a pale horse-ish
I'm a big believer in UFOs, but I'm not sold on this new whistleblower yet. Anybody can say anything, but without proof, it's just talk. People have spoken about crash retrieval programs for decades. If one has been following ufology like I have throughout the years, he isn't saying anything new. I want to see the proof. At least with Elizondo, he provided videos. This new guy is just reporting what he heard from other people. I find that problematic. Hopefully it will come to something, but until he provides some sort of evidence, his claims mean little to me.
delete
I posted that in the other thread already. The occupants of the craft (dead) were reported as being 5'11" with blonde hair, the rough sketches of the craft give the appearance of some sort of early rocket, and the Italians' first assumption was that it was an experimental German craft that has flown and crashed over the border. The ET narrative around it developed later.
I don't have any reason to doubt the USA eventually took possession of it, but..... seriously doubt it was aliens. And I'd bet anything all of his "documents" that have any validity say the same thing - documentation of a crash retrieval program that doesn't talk about any proof of aliens at all.
Last edited:
