And 0 of those studies show that those occur in all contexts. Zero.
Like I said, you either don't understand the studies, or you don't understand how to critically evaluate studies. To say that if someone feels fear, they are by definition not a psychopath, is simply incorrect. And you acknowledge it in at least half your posts on the matter (contradicting your earlier statement). Not to mention... context.
If your argument is that it doesn't happen in all contexts, I would agree, this is why studies use words such as hardly, dearth, very little, low level, etc....
Studies already described the context required to be diagnose a psychopath, and it occurs at a high enough level for them to believe MOST psychopaths possess these characteristics.
When they look at the diagnostic measures, it is found psychopath feel little emotion, fear, remorse, or empathy. MRIs, EEGs, and physiologic studies all support these findings. The countless psychopaths diagnosed meet these clinical criterias at varying degrees.
All their emotions such as anger and anxiety are superficial and dictated in the subcortex in the limibic system. Complex emotions such as love and compassion are not present at significant level because it requires the involvement of the cortex region which fail to activate.
ARE YOU ARGUING THE FINDINGS ARE INCONCLUSIVE
because it does not happen in all contexts.
OR...ARE YOU ARGUING NO RULES SHOULD APPLY BECAUSE EXCEPTIONS EXIST?
OR...ARE YOU ARGUING STUDIES DISAGREE PSYCHOPATHS EXISTS?