The script for WW3 just leaked....

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,239
Reputation
4,045
Daps
46,032
Is Russia imperialist?

Like America, the Soviet Union was an Empire in all but name. And Putin is trying to revive that.

Nah Sweden is preparing for war. Russia is up to something. Russia wants the smoke.

I agree that they are up to something. However, I'm not sure they can sustain a battle on two fronts, they are running out of money, people, materiel and China ain't gon fund them forever. Especially if there's a NATO scale conflict. Here's the thing about Russia...without China they are a paper tiger. They have no real might without them. And even though China is what it is, I'm not entirely sure they'd even want to engage with US + NATO in full blown conflict. Because their allies simply aren't up to snuff militarily. Iran and N. Korea (potentially) might be non-factors. Especially since the US has air/naval footholds in Japan, S. Korea, the Philippines and Australia. Soft power is China's game. But none of us know China's ACTUAL military power so idk.

But outside of a ICBM strike, they'd have no way execute on with scale in the Pacific without massive losses. Let alone make landfall. Not that war is even fought that way anymore though. There might be sleeper cells already here, but even then, unless they got yellowcake strapped to them. I don't see how they do enough damage to make a significant difference.

If Europe and NATO had any balls, they'd march into Moscow and just end it all. But no, let's keep the region in limbo in perpetuity. :stopitslime:

Here's the thing. Russia is MASSIVE. Resource rich but MASSIVE. Taking out Russia without a true reason means the entire region falls apart and almost no nation has the infrastructure to manage it. It would be the colonization of Africa all over again only with less people. Pure chaos as random rebel factions pop-up all over western Russia while ethnic and sectarian groups pop up in the east.
Not to mention Russia's sphere of influence means you now also have to micro-manage the former Soviet states as well. All of the -stans, most of Eastern Europe, Mongolia, N.Korea and more now all have to be either annexed, occupied or fought in order to bring them under "western" powers. That's a logistical and military impossibility in the current climate post-Afghanistan withdrawal.

On top of all this, you all but assure that China WILL join in against you 100% as opposed to China deciding not to intervene militarily if Russia is the aggressor (like in Ukraine).

You'd have to be ok with sacrificing potentially a BILLION+ people just to run up in Russia and that's not good math.
 

Nkrumah Was Right

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
8,957
Reputation
1,076
Daps
25,947
You mean dropping them during a full out all on world war, which isn't just dropping them willy nilly on a country for no reason like you are implying.

:martin:

Your original claim was that America could destroy Russia and it that it would do so if there was good cause.

This is funny, and ahistorical, because it omits that for decades the Soviet Union and its Russian successor state has more nuclear weapons than the United States.

Obviously, ‘MAD’ is a greater deterrent than America’s supposed ethics and morality (outside of a “full scale war”)

Gen Zs, man :troll: :dead:
 

Gritsngravy

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
8,044
Reputation
567
Daps
16,244
As if the US can't fund a World War...

etOA7u8.gif
I doubt USA can support a campaign by themselves and nobody in the world can withstand a heavy causality war
 

Gritsngravy

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
8,044
Reputation
567
Daps
16,244
Nah France will fight. Remember when they got dog walked by the Germans and the UK was about to get the same treatment and we sent the redneck to the beach and turned the while war around. If Russia comes for any place in Europe they better stand up.
Well German and France always had beef, I just don’t think France hit the same energy with russia
They lowkey want to join the Brics
 

Maximus Rex

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
6,935
Reputation
-3,832
Daps
16,386
Reppin
The Evils of Men
Your original claim was that America could destroy Russia and it that it would do so if there was good cause.

This is funny, and ahistorical, because it omits that for decades the Soviet Union and its Russian successor state has more nuclear weapons than the United States.

Obviously, ‘MAD’ is a greater deterrent than America’s supposed ethics and morality (outside of a “full scale war”)

Gen Zs, man :troll: :dead:

I said NATO would destroy Russia and the thread is about a ground war being started because Russia would start a war with Germany, a NATO member, which they would get annihilated in.

You then brought up nukes for whatever reason like it means something, like the United States or NATO just goes around nuclear bombing countries it doesn't like.

Keep using that Lebron troll face, just shows how stupid you really are.
 

boogers

cats rule, dogs drool
Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
7,189
Reputation
2,889
Daps
21,081
Reppin
#catset
:dahell:

people out there really think russia is this suicidal?

yall better calm down and listen to the great bishop bullwinkle, rip

 

Grand Conde

Superstar
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
16,955
Reputation
3,230
Daps
26,932
Reppin
NULL

Clifs:
Putin will mobilize another 200 000 troops this year
Since the US is focused on elections + Israel, he will conquer Ukraine
NATO will mobilize 300 000 troops in 2025

80037041-12964575-image-m-43_1705335356333.jpg
Daily Mail. 🙄
 
Top