The rich gets richer and poor gets poorer dynamic is reflected in modern dating game as well

[WIA20XX]

THESE WOMEN ARE ALL ALONE BREH

They're all over my timeline.

Girls trips to Paris, weekly "wine downs", flexing designers shoes and handbags, "fur babies"...

 

[Swagnificent]

Born wealthy men tend to date and mate with women from their own background, women that have high social currency. And that high social currency then manifest into physical currency.

If a woman attends Yale, she makes friends with other high status women. If she joins an eating club, she expands her network of high status women. Most of these women within her network are going to marry high powered men in the future.

True. But rich men keep side chicks and hoes of all backgrounds.

It's rare to find a successful man fukking only one vagina. He typically has several and each got a role.

 

[Swagnificent]

Those were simpler times, arranged marriages gave pre historic lames and bums the opportunity to spread their seed before leaving the earth

Arranged marriages were actually more difficult for men. At least now guys with good looks can trick women into giving them p*ssy despite being bums. Back in the days those guys never made it past the father. Arranged marriages required the man to have resources. Now at least broke guys stand a chance if they have the looks.

 

[Swagnificent]

It simple actually. There are plenty of lonely men and women out there

The lonely men who are àverage find it increasingly difficult to get women and some have just straight up giving up while the lonely women are not willing to "settle"

And yes, some men have multiple side chicks, this is especially common in most African countries where women,especially the younger ones,willingly accept the role of sidechick

If African and Middld Eastern countries they're just more official with the side chicks. They give them titles like second or third wife. In the West we have the same thing in practice we just hide it.

Human nature is universal. Everywhere on the planet women share the top men while the guys at the bottom get nothing.

 

[RichRistretto]

As always, let's use facts and information to dispel some coli myths.

Myth 1: There are single women everywhere. You're just lame. This is true and wrong at the same time. from the ages of 18 to 30, there are more men than women. The black community is the only community that has a slight gender surplus of women between 18-24 due to economic and racial issues (prison, death, gay) affecting black men. The Jonathan Soma MAP shows us that young men to middle-aged men are fukked until about age 50, which makes sense because that's when women divorce their husbands on average, and a decent number of men are dead at this point.

"Among 20- and 30-somethings, almost every single city in America has more single men than single women. Although no single woman in New York will believe it, I promise it's true." Gender Ratio
"Once you get up into your 50s, though, the balance shifts to extra single women everywhere."

Myth 2 You don't have to be an NBA starter to get p*ssy. This one again is halfway true; women until about age 30, aka the wall, only want men generally 5"11 and up. The famous Bumble graph shows this. from 5"11 to 6"0 is a 30% jump in p*ssy rate, damn.

Height

Myth 3: Dating apps are a good way to meet women. WRONG in-person approach benefits the average man way more

"Aviv Goldgeier, an engineer for the dating website Hinge, recently analyzed the share of “likes” on Hinge that went to the most-liked people of each gender. He found that inequality on dating apps is stark and that it was significantly worse for men. The top 1% of guys get more than 16% of all likes on the app, compared to just over 11% for the top 1% of women. (Unlike swipe-based Tinder, Hinge is based on a system of “liking” some particular aspect of a person’s profile.)"

Myth 4: There are plenty of attractive women out here. Wrong; most women and men are overweight. everyone is delusional. Damn
Weight

 

[KeysT]

I agree to some extent. But only some. Most women are not sharing a man even into their 30s. Which is what you’re arguing. That’s when women get scared of not getting a ring. Generally women will try to shoot for the stars in college, and in their 20s, try to fight after the same 10% of men, then by 30, they wise up and start pressuring men for commitment. Pregnancy rates have dropped considerably compared to previous decades so these broads aren’t getting married and they aren’t creating families. And common sense tells you no man is gonna have 2-3 side chicks for the rest of his life. THESE WOMEN ARE ALL ALONE BREH. That’s all I’m saying. The math doesn’t math anyway else. What happens is when these broads try to get with a top class man, and fail at it, they choose to be permanently single rather than date their average equal. That makes sense with the world I see.

We are making the same point. Women shoot up and don’t have to settle for an Average guy their level because they can now take care of themselves.

 

[Shadow King]

Poor people stay having kids tho

Most of my single guy friends get p*ssy and they're all either fluffy, have receding hairlines, or broke




A lot of you need to fix your self-esteem or go get some hobbies man.

The poor and rich was an allegory...

 

[ABlackMan]

Gotta know how to cut a promo on a chick lol

Got one number last week just going for it.

Got one yesterday cause she just went for it. I’m thinking bout clapping that ass Friday

 

[Shadow King]

I’ll never understand this topic. There’s an even split of men and women. Women cannot be happy and coupled up long term if men aren’t. The only way this logic works is if one man has 2-3 women as side chicks to offset 2-3 other men having no one. While that may happen in our 20s and 30s, that’s not gonna be something that goes on for life. How many 40 and 50 yo side chicks are there Everyone eventually has to pair up.

This is exactly what happens though, more than you think.

 

[Shadow King]

There was no dating. Families usually just set up their kids. Modern dating is only like 40ish years old and online dating is 20ish.

Most people are just bumping their heads figuring it out

Eh... modern dating as we know, I guess, because it's tied into the full blown integration of women working full-time, and divorcing, but kids being set up by their parents wasn't common 40 years ago.

 

[Cloutius Maximus]

My friends brother is the craziest nikka. Gotta dirty ass crib doesn’t give a fukk about his appearance a coke head doesn’t have his lisence or a vehicle has 3 kids and in his friend circle they look for him to get women. He is a natural charmer and I remember one time this dude fukked like 5 chicks in one day. He went to rehab and got kicked out because he got p*ssy up in there. I can’t even count how many times he’s cheated on his baby mama and they’ve broken up and she’s took him back.

That dude has above average charisma, "game", and might even have dark triad characteristics (the drug use and impulsive behavior).

What about dudes who don't have the gift of gab tho or aren't super charismatic? There were always smooth talkers and macks in the community and we looked up to them but now we expect the average dude to be a smooth talker. A lot of our grandfathers weren't charismatic like that, they were solid dudes who worked hard and that was enough.

 

[Ozymandeas]

They're all over my timeline.

Girls trips to Paris, weekly "wine downs", flexing designers shoes and handbags, "fur babies"...

Same

All hoping that James St. Patrick or Idris Elba comes to save them in their $1,000 suit, $200 dress shoes and peacoat

 

[Forsaken]

Plenty of women out there. There are undesirable men just like there are undesirable women.

The undesirable tag is subjective though.

 

[Wild self]

That dude has above average charisma, "game", and might even have dark triad characteristics (the drug use and impulsive behavior).

What about dudes who don't have the gift of gab tho or aren't super charismatic? There were always smooth talkers and macks in the community and we looked up to them but now we expect the average dude to be a smooth talker. A lot of our grandfathers weren't charismatic like that, they were solid dudes who worked hard and that was enough.

Blame rap post 2000 and social media, that expects every male to be some Future/Gucci Mane/ Drake/ Lil Durk knockoff

 

[Rick Fox at UNC]

Go outside.