I'm surprised it took you this long to play it. All of them are pretty good, but that first game is a classic to methe whole game was hella creepy with the little girl popping up
The PC Thread - Tips, Benchmarks, Specs, Laptops, Custom Desktops, Pre-Builds and more.
And it still didn't work right I bet. What a piece of shyt game.
ran smooth for me with my i5 3570k and 16gb RAM.
now that I look, it does require 6gb. the cpu requirements aren't anything crazy though (Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66Ghz or AMD Phenom II X4 940 @ 3.0Ghz)
that game ran fine for me when I turned textures down. I think it's got an unfair reputation as a 'terrible PC port'
itsyoung!!
Veteran
No one cares about PC gaming
I get more people in my house for friday night NBA 2k + Madden Tournaments edit: those pictures kinda deceiving though even in Season 1 they still were in a big venue with thousands watching. Just not on the scale of 2014 though
it's kinda sad that it seems fps games have basically regressed since then. now we're stuck with non-reactive, bullet-sponge, brain-dead AI
F.E.A.R. was actually developed by the same studio that did Shadow of Mordor (Monolith)
Watch dogs was a disaster. You gotta turn the textures down to sub-ps4 levels for it not to stutter.
Ubisoft should be given no leeway with that shytty port.
People had to hack it to get og graphics. People had to used hacked .exes for it to run smoothly.
shyt's unacceptable.
Ubisoft should be given no leeway with that shytty port.
People had to hack it to get og graphics. People had to used hacked .exes for it to run smoothly.
shyt's unacceptable.
it was a "disaster" because you had to turn textures down?
it was a "disaster" because you had to turn textures down?
Just the idea that you had to go through a lot of troubleshooting and such, for a game to run somewhat smoothly, was whack.
Why are you calling this a good port now?it was a "disaster" because you had to turn textures down?
nobody was liking it. It's considered a bad port across the board by everybodyI see why everybody hits you with the
You shouldn't have to game at sub ps4 levels on a 780
The game was horribly optimized.
"wack" and "inconvenient" sure, but hardly a "disaster"
if having to turn textures down is a "disaster", what do you call the situation with The Evil Within?
I didn't play the game at 900p and 30fps, but apparently I lost to the PS4 cause I had to turn textures downWhy are you calling this a good port now?
I see why everybody hits you with the
You shouldn't have to game at sub ps4 levels on a 780
The game was horribly optimized.
how's the PS4 version on 3 monitors?
spliz
SplizThaDon
The PC version of FEAR 1 is one of the illest shooters out there...
it's on sale for $2.50 on gamefly if anyone hasn't played yet
http://digital.gamefly.com/#!/download-fear/150730?adtrackingid=cmju029
Unplayable because it stutters...still. And I need a hack to play it in 3 monitors because ubisoft forgot they promised that they were gonna make it surround/eyefinity enabled. And the hack doesn't work completely cuz the cellphone is all cut off.
If 2x vsync worked, and I could actually play it at a steady 30fps, I'd be happy, but that shyt doesn't work right for some reason, and still results in stutter.
I'm glad I didn't buy the game, but rather got it for free. It's one big mess.
I dunno why anyone would cape for ubisoft and watch dogs.
It's a horrible port.