Nah the bold is cappin. I been doin this shyt forever and ain’t no way u sayin this shyt with DLSS 2.0. It looks better in some games period because it’s better than the anti aliasing solution some of these games have. It makes everything crisp. Not always. But for SOME games damn straight. It would def rather have double the fukking performance with a game that looks a LITTLE less than native any day of the week. I don’t even gotta think twice about it.
DLSS lowers the resolution
ultra settings is ultra settings, ultra settings at native 4k looks better than ultra settings with DLSS
the whole point of DLSS is improve performance not image quality, do you even have a 3080
DLSS looks better than lowering the games resolution on a 4k screen to get higher frames, but it don't look better than native 4k thats pure cap
The whole selling point of the 3090 is that by using DLSS you can get 60fps in 8k, which would still look incredible even if it's not native 4k, but shyt LG OLED looks better than Samsung 8k QLED, so its kinda pointless
Like DLSS to me will better in a couple years with raytracing, cyberpunk is the real test, the raytracing is suppose to worth it where you don't want to play the game without it, we shall see
also the AIB AMDS haven't released yet, and they are said to perform way better than the reference cards AMDs released
the 3080 FE was not a reference card, that's why AIB performances is barely a difference
NVIDIA is better because the top games usually have effects and features you can only use with NVIDIA cards, and Cyberpunk will be no different