I'm in the market to buy a new monitor this year, and in all the research I've been doing I keep running into people saying the same surprising thing over and over again:
It's almost UNIVERSAL that everyone who compares the two prefers high refresh rates (120-144Hz) over 4K resolution.
I still remember the days years ago whey they used to say the human eye couldn't even perceive beyond 48FPS.
It took me a long time to accept it (I still haven't played a 120Hz game first hand), but when nearly everyone says the same thing you start to take notice. Basically, what most people seem to be saying is that there really isn't a GPU around that can run a top tier game at full 4K 60Hz with all detail set to the max, but even if you could almost everyone who compares the two actually prefers playing the same games with the same settings at 1440p 144Hz.
I play Civ 6 on my 4K TV and my main PC monitor is still an old flickering 1200p 60Hz monitor, but I'm now leaning towards something like the 34" ultrawide LG monitors:
The combined resolution is so much lower than 4K that it should have no problem getting into ultra high FPS territory.
Actually most pc games can run max at 4K, 60fps with the 2080ti.
I have two 2080tis and with some games I can run at like 100fps, max at 4K with the dlss feature on.
Games are actually pretty optimized with the 2080ti, at least more than in the past.
And yeah, RTX is a mother fukking game changer.
I rock an Asus 4K, 144hz g-sync. shyt is nice
Edit: also, do not buy an ultra wide. Most games don’t support 21:9 well, and you’ll be playing letterboxed for nearly everything. Ultrawides are only good in theory.