DNA on guns is often inconclusive. The case does not hinge on that.They Cant Prove that He shot her for the simple fact the DNA on the gun is Inconclusive and He wasnt the only one with GSR on them. They Have to Convince the Jury that it was him who shot her while her the victim didnt actually see who shot her for sure and the evidence as well her statement dont match.
The victim and at least one other witness identify him as the shooter. He was obviously at the scene. He had gun residue on him.
None of the stuff about who was fighting/fukking who why they left the party, etc even matters.
It’s gonna be difficult to convince the jury meg is lying and going through all of this cause she wants to hurt tory for sleeping around. And that her and the girl a secretly friends conspiring against tory all the way from the moments after the shooting happened.