She has wrote some suspect articles over the years and to be honest I think it’s because she has not attracted the type of black man she wanted all these years working in sports. Like I remember she wrote an article 10 plus years ago about how black athletes need to marry the mother of their kids. Alot of times her articles come off from a place of hurt instead of fair criticism.
Yea because Meg being a violent drunk has no relevance right???
Meg should quit rapping, and become a wrestler. Just make that hot girl shyt her gimmick.
all round, I don't think he remembers or saw it all clearly enough.
He doesn't have a history of domestic violence. MEGAN does tho.
I think it's pretty obvious that he didn't account for the law ruling being hit with projectile fragments as being shot. He probably thought that was a technicality and that you had to be shot directly to be considered "shot".
Since the trial started, I’ve only heard accounts about the witnesses and one expert talk about GSR. Where is the officer’s reports? If the police investigation concluded she got shot, who made that determination, how did they, and where is the documentation? Why has it not been clearly stated if she had a bullet in her foot vs bullet fragments. Where were the 5 bullets, were they collected? If he shot at her feet five times, did they find evidence on the street? Did cars get hit? How many fragments in her foot? What type of gunshot wound was it. There are different types. These are all important questions that are required to be answered in any investigation. My point is the standard evidence that should be used and is more factual is playing background to the he said, she said. Why is it that posters on here are asking more relevant questions than the lawyers paid to prosecute this case then. Something is off.Cause it’s a trial.
That’s what happens in a trial. Witnesses are called. Experts were called. There was documentation and testimony from the hospital. The police investigation concluded that meg got shot and identified tory. another witness identified tory. The gun was found in tory’s car. Gun residue on tory’s hands. The police recommended to charge tory. Sounds simple
All of the controversy and he say she say comes from Naps internet
That’s kinda sad.
Its crazy how no ballistics have been outlined yet. Because i and many others maintain that no way she was directly shot in her foot with no broken bones or tendons.
You are only getting the controversial sound bites from twitter. They had a whole ass trial and did all this.
Don’t matter what you and others “maintain”
I really didn't want to replyDon’t matter what you and others “maintain”
The girl got shot. No one is disputing that, not even the defense.
Like i said, all the controversy is from people on the internet that want a certain outcome.
