The official ‘Tory Lanez vs Megan Thee Stallion’ trial thread.

[AtlienInTheGoodieMob]

Seeing social media take on this trial shows just how little people know about trials

Its all about swaying the jury, it’s obvious that Tory side is trying to hammer in reasonable doubt.

 

[FeverPitch2]

There’s nothing obvious without video evidence or the incident

What's obvious is that this Tory raging out and shooting at Megan's feet isn't what happened.
What's obvious is that Meg wasn't shot. She got hit by bullet fragments.
What's obvious is that both Tory and Kelsey had GSR on them.
What's obvious is that Kelsey took an immunity deal to testify and pleads the fifth in order to not incriminate herself.

Make of it what you will, Captain.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

if we say that she's a wash that doesn't help prosecutors. They have the burden. She's proved to have something to hide there's a reason why she's lying.. now you have GSR on her that supports Tory's defense claim..

See how easy that is? That's doubt

The entire case isn’t hinged on one witness.

They could have never called her or talked to her at all and they would still have a case.

Her reason for lying is her reason. Jury is usually instructed not to speculate.

The GSR on her doesn’t support any claims.


Again with the “doubt” shyt you clearly don’t understand.

Literally EVERY criminal case the defense brings doubt that’s their job.

Like take another high profile recent case. They charged the guy alleged to murder Takeoff based off of DNA on a glass.

By your logic all the defense has to say is “well everyone touched that glass”

Then you say “see that’s doubt he’s innocent”

 

[Jefferson Jackson]

I’m not a lawyer or a jury or a judge

All I know is for 2 years the Coli has been claiming Meg was lying about being shot and the Coli was pretending to like Torey giving off extreme incel vibes

the more you post, the easier it is to see why your rep is in the deep red.

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

Again with the “doubt” shyt you clearly don’t understand.

Bro.. 200+ posts in.. it's clear that u are the one who doesn't understand. The doubt created here isn't some flimsy ass hail mary from the defense. her actions and the GSR on her alone can create enough doubt where it's possible she did it. That's really all the defense needs in some cases. LOL.

 

[cauliflower]

That's not why you are lost. it's not about what detail was true or what wasn't.. if she lied on the stand she could have lied on those tapes too. That's what you are missing. The point is she got on the stand and didn't help prosecutors at all.. she opened herself up to perjury and other charges and u have no clue why she would do that. There's no logic to any of it because Tory's team is painting her as the shooter. They obviously aren't in cahoots. So for what purpose would she do all this?

You're contradicting yourself. She did help the prosecutors in the end, she helped everyone establish some shyt happened from September until now, the juror's were the ones taking notes listening to every word she said thanks to her saying she felt pressured by prosecution (although it is not evidence). This whole case is Tory vs the DA, it makes sense why she would request immunity, forget and say IDK to everything tory did and conveniently remember all of megan's actions from the party up until the shooting happened and go back to "idk when i sent that text" "i never seen megan shot".

 

[Keep_It_Hip_Hop_Fam]

That's not true. A doctor said she stepped on glass.. and a lot of people said "probably fragments.. not direct" because she was dancing around 2 days later as if nothing happened.

u are leaving all that out... just to support your dumb narrative.

They also neglect to mention the reason for the not being shot narrative started because Meg said she stepped on glass.

Her statement was the catalyst for the narrative in the first place.

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

it makes sense why she would request immunity, forget and say IDK to everything tory did and conveniently remember all of megan's actions from the party up until the shooting happened and go back to "idk when i sent that text" "i never seen megan shot".

For what purpose? What's the logic there.. i posed that question 3 times now. Why would an innocent bystander do that?

 

[cauliflower]

That's not true. A doctor said she stepped on glass.. and a lot of people said "probably fragments.. not direct" because she was dancing around 2 days later as if nothing happened.

u are leaving all that out... just to support your dumb narrative.

This right here is how you know you have no clue what you're talking about, but you're "on no one's side" and consider yourself middle ground while attacking others for being "biased." It's been confirmed Megan was shot, The defense isn't trying to argue that point, the surgeon who assisted in the procedure went up on the stand yesterday and once again confirmed this.


Can you provide proof or any reliable source as to where megan's doctor said she stepped on glass?????

 

[Breh Obama]

Megan the StalLYING

 

[LieutenantDan]

 

[Burned Verses]

Part of me says this shouldn’t matter but the only people still riding for this chick are literal woat posters and alts lol

All the smarter simps from the first pages fell way tf back

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

This right here is how you know you have no clue what you're talking about, but you're "on no one's side"and consider yourself middle ground. It's been confirmed Megan was shot,

i replied to his "for the last 2 years... " comment. What the hell are u on?

 

[TrifeGod]

LAPD

 

[LieutenantDan]