Kilgore Trout
Banned
an honor to be included in this
2016 In Focus: THUMP's 40 Best Electronic Music Photos of the Year | Thump
2016 In Focus: THUMP's 40 Best Electronic Music Photos of the Year | Thump
thats whats up. 2 of my homies are in that listan honor to be included in this
2016 In Focus: THUMP's 40 Best Electronic Music Photos of the Year | Thump
So I'm thinking of these three lenses
Canon 50mm 1.8
Canon 70-200mmm pricey but
Canon 35 1.4
Any third party equivalent that might be cheaper. ??
On a full frame camera, i would rather get the 35 1.4 than the 50mm
You can always rent lenses until you have enough paper to purchase one. Or if you have other friends in photography you can borrow their lenses
50mm 1.8 is cheap though
Just the other two
The 35 1.4 is like 2-3 times the quality of the 50 and it's a great all around lens.
What would you recommend first
The 70-200 or 35mm 1.4?
70-200 is cool if you in the pit for concerts, sports, and portraits. I guess if you a 2nd shooter at a wedding it might be aite. But that lens is mad impersonal. Good for being a creeper thoI used to use my 70-200 a lot for candids of people.....but then I saw my bro shoot a whole wedding on a 35mm and he just moved wherever he needed to get his shot and I realized I was "hiding" behind the 70-200mm. 35 is perhaps one of the most versatile lenses out.
70-200 is cool if you in the pit for concerts, sports, and portraits. I guess if you a 2nd shooter at a wedding it might be aite. But that lens is mad impersonal. Good for being a creeper tho
70-200 is cool if you in the pit for concerts, sports, and portraits. I guess if you a 2nd shooter at a wedding it might be aite. But that lens is mad impersonal. Good for being a creeper tho
For some reason I just can't get into the 50mm focal length on a full frame camera. I feel you could do so much more and be creative with a 35mm.50mm 1.8 is cheap though
Just the other two
yeah I swear by my Sigma 35mm 1.8 for jobsI used to use my 70-200 a lot for candids of people.....but then I saw my bro shoot a whole wedding on a 35mm and he just moved wherever he needed to get his shot and I realized I was "hiding" behind the 70-200mm. 35 is perhaps one of the most versatile lenses out.
well yeah, for starters you won't find yourself having to move as far back as possible, sometimes tucked into a corner just to fit everyone into the picture, you just aim and shoot. Bokeh on those lenses are pretty damn good too. It's not 70-200 2.8 bokeh, but its good enough.For some reason I just can't get into the 50mm focal length on a full frame camera. I feel you could do so much more and be creative with a 35mm.