I didnt say better fighter, I said more talented fighter. And talent is jjudged when both fighters are fresh and when both fighters are fresh Connor outclasses the shyt out of Nate and his overrated boxing and inability to protect himself from basic leg kicks(imagine if Aldo came up and fought Nate) inability to grapple a smaller fighter to the ground. Nate should be embarrassed at that performance. I dont see him lasting 5 rounds with Connor or Aldo at 155 poundsHow is he the better fighter. Better striker sure, faster and more efficient when striking sure.
But they are 1 and 1. Diaz STOPPED conor on 10 days. Conor beat diaz to a decision that was unconvincing. I personally gave it to nate but have no issue with the decision.
When talkin better fighter we also take into account durability and endurance. Ground game is no question. We aredy forgetting what nate did in the first fight.