A lot of projection going on in this thread. I never said I would support the policy. All I said was that is what would happen. You people don’t understand human nature.
You’re lying if you don’t think any powerful nation would over respond to a terrorist attack that killed thousands.
Two eyes for an eye has been carried out since the dawn of human civilization.
The first responsibility of a government is to protect it its citizens and when attacked the first inclination is to respond with force.
You terrorist sympathizers are so left wing to defend Hamas for their actions but aren’t left wing enough to realize that there is always options other than violence to achieve the goals of freedom.
Bad faith breakdown:
- Pretending people condemning Israel's actions means they were "surprised" it happened. That way he can pretend like he just "predicted" it would happen, so all he's doing is just "telling it like it is." A favorite move of cryptofascists. This makes him feel like he has plausible deniability in his support for fascism, ethnic cleansing and genocide.
You'll never hear these morons saying "you think an oppressed people forced into a pressure cooker with no way out wouldn't lash out with terrorism?" They wouldn't see that as "telling it like it is," because even though it follows the same logic and has just as much history to back it up, it frames things from a perspective that doesn't show Israel in a good light. Those people get branded as terrorist sympathizers. This gives away the game completely.
- Framing war crimes, fascism, genocide, etc as human nature, historical, a normal reaction, aka the status quo. This is an attempt to justify and normalize Israel's unjustifiable actions while again trying to give himself plausible deniability.
- Disingenuously conflating empathy for innocent citizens and the condemnation of Israel with support for terrorism. This is immediately after calling genocide "an eye for an eye," "protecting it's citizens," and something "any powerful nation" would do. Completely unserious and insincere.
- Attempting to frame Palestinians as unwilling to achieve freedom through nonviolent means, when
at the very top of the page it was already pointed out to him that they've tried that, like with the March of Return peaceful protests, and Israel
maimed and murdered them for it, and still continued to oppress them and build more settlements. He can't claim ignorance because it was already pointed out to him. He is being knowingly disingenuous. It's a blatant attempt to victim blame.
Imagine trying to say Haitians were wrong because they didn't use nonviolent means to free themselves from their oppressors. Victim blaming in the face of horrifying oppression is pure sociopathy.
Short post, yet filled with so much horseshyt. This man is not only a fascist sympathizer but a coward as well.