☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,020
Reputation
-34,337
Daps
618,466
Reppin
The Deep State
Interesting analysis. Not sure I agree with all the conclusions here but worth discussing.


on the flip side…

ironically Sam was being, for his own fukked up moral code given his history, way more rational than Weinstein :huhldup:

Weinstein was raising some interesting points though…Israel basically might win battles but may lose the war at some point. It’s fundamentally different societies and values and palestinians keep blowing deals and off-roads.

 
Last edited:

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,847
Reppin
the ether
Breh is really posting Sam Harris vs. Eric Weinstein debates on Palestine. :snoop:

Two men who have zero expertise or credibility in the topic or region and both of whom hold incredibly strong biases against one of the parties involved.


Next you're going to post Charles Murray vs. Ben Shapiro on intellect in the Black community. :why:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,020
Reputation
-34,337
Daps
618,466
Reppin
The Deep State
Breh is really posting Sam Harris vs. Eric Weinstein debates on Palestine. :snoop:

Two men who have zero expertise or credibility in the topic or region and both of whom hold incredibly strong biases against one of the parties involved.


Next you're going to post Charles Murray vs. Ben Shapiro on intellect in the Black community. :why:
Did you miss the Pascal Robert discussion right next to it? Yes? Hey two center right wing JEWS are talking about the issue with nuance and you can’t handle it.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,847
Reppin
the ether
Did you miss the Pascal Robert discussion right next to it? Yes? Hey two center right wing JEWS are talking about the issue with nuance and you can’t handle it.

WTF are you talking about? I'm commenting on you seriously posting a Sam Harris vs. Eric Weinstein discussion as if either of them have anything worth listening to about the Middle East. Neither have the slightest background, education, or expertise in the relevant issues, both have proven their bias and bigotry towards Muslims in the past, and both have proven time and time again to be fukking idiots when it comes to commentary on current events. Pascal Robert is nowhere in that post.

You just shytpost literally worthless commentary like crazy, if you actually have a job like you claim (I mean a job besides spamming forums), then you haven't even read and watched everything you post and link here, it wouldn't be physically possible. And if you had a shred of discernment, you would only repost the most valuable shyt you watch. Where's your fukking filter?


What do you think would happen if you only posted the best 10% of the videos you watched, and the most enlightening 10% of the commentary you read? Do you think your impact would improve or diminish?
 
Top