null
...
I remember reading an article a long time ago that examined the differences between popular american sports and "soccer".
one was the low scoring. soccer was perceived as a sport where less happens because there was less scoring and fewer recorded events.
what could media talk about or market or build stories around with no goals and not much else.
the thing is the many things that were actually happening were not readily accessible to people who did not understand the game.
there were few hard numbers.
the lack of data meant that the entire analytics branch had less to work with.
marketing had less to talk about.
it's the same in US sports. in politics. in cricket. in education (league tables).
the modern way, driven by the US, is to lead with stats first. and build the stories off that.
one was the low scoring. soccer was perceived as a sport where less happens because there was less scoring and fewer recorded events.
what could media talk about or market or build stories around with no goals and not much else.
the thing is the many things that were actually happening were not readily accessible to people who did not understand the game.
there were few hard numbers.
the lack of data meant that the entire analytics branch had less to work with.
marketing had less to talk about.
it's the same in US sports. in politics. in cricket. in education (league tables).
the modern way, driven by the US, is to lead with stats first. and build the stories off that.