Essential The Official Football (Soccer) Thread - We are SO back, the Premier League returns!

[null]

I have no articles on the other issue but based on the bbc article they both seem like the punishment should be the same

https://metro.co.uk/2023/10/26/man-utd-winger-alejandro-garnacho-faces-ban-over-deleted-andre-onana-post-19722196/

they are not the same due to what i stated in my last post.

one has plausible deniability. the cavani one does not.

asking. the following two questions illustrates the difference

Q1. was the post referring to race.
garnacho: not known. most likely no.
cavani: yes

Q2. was the post intended to be an insult.
garnacho: not known. most likely no.
cavani: not known. most likely no.

 

[Low End Derrick]

Shakhtar

 

[Jaylen Tatum]

Kate looking delicious

 

[Low End Derrick]

Ruben, what are you doing?

 

[THEREALBRAND]

Celtic is a man down with over 60 minutes left

 

[247Alex]

mbappe shank - rare.

 

[ciubaca]

Big sexy

 

[Nero Christ]

Giroud is a big match performer

 

[Ukbrotha]

Of course Garnacho isn't being charged over the ape emojis. I'm sure you guys are really upset about this.

Did you also cry when Cavani was banned?

 

[THEREALBRAND]

I’m so glad Atleti has been playing attacking football, and trying to bury Celtic.

 

[Ukbrotha]

I have no articles on the other issue but based on the bbc article they both seem like the punishment should be the same

He escaped the ban because like it's been explained they accepted his explanation that he was referencing both Onana and Maguire as strength.

 

[THEREALBRAND]

5 goals is good, but I want MORE

 

[TobiOT]

Brendan Rodgers getting humiliated in Europe once again.

 

[TobiOT]

"Group of death"

 

[mson]

Ok Milan!