/PostIt's always impressive to improve a win count.
/PostIt's always impressive to improve a win count.
Shut yo c00n ass up Ain’t nobody trying to hear this koonbYA babbleThus why all of the "c00n," "cac because you disagree with me," "on code," and all of the Black culture gatekeeping is an absolute negative mark on a forum geared towards discussions of our lives as Black people.
However, if the admin team of this site is fine with all of this buffoonery, stupidity, childish get-backs, and lack of critical thinking, all we can do is suffer for the allowed foolishness.
and scott frost at ucf took over an 0-12 team and went 6-7 (bowl game loss) and then 13-0.
Yes and no.
It's always impressive to improve a win count. But not as impressive when the bar is so low. Sure, if they end up 4-8, they "improved" but are still a 4 win team. That's not a "good" team.
It's worthy of credit but taking a total trash team to a simply bad team isn't a water into wine accomplishment.
It's not easy to go from terrible to good, but the hardest thing to do is to go from good to great.
Lots of halfway competent coaches can take a terrible team and make them less bad or mediocre. A competent coach can make them good.
Deion has done a stellar job in many respects, but the real impressive job will be in years 3-4 IF he continues to win more each year.
Lincoln took a team from 4 wins to 11 and he's looking like a whole hoe
That's hate
LincGOAT don't deserve that
wait, yall have turned on Lincoln? lolfukk em
Shut yo c00n ass up Ain’t nobody trying to hear this koonbYA babble
In year 2 he's getting hate.Lincoln took a team from 4 wins to 11 and he's looking like a whole hoe
In year 2 he's getting hate.
In year 1 he got his credit. But year 2 he's going backwards.
And that reinforces my point a bit. Sure, it's nice to go from a 1-4 win team to a 4-7 win team in year 1, but can a coach then take the next steps from there each year?
That's where the determination of whether or not a coach did an impressive job can really be made, probably after year 2.
Year after year after year. Lots of coaches can be a one year wonder (e.g. Brady Hoke (took a 7 win rich rod team and won 11 games including the Orange bowl his first year), Mel Tucker, etc).
He really did but his mid-tier performance after Kenneth Walker left would have led to them finding some bullshyt to fire him on eventually. He just made it too easy for them.Mel Tucker..smh
That nygga fuhked it all up.
c00n wakes up early in the morning to post graphic homo erotic content this is what you c00ns are at the end of the dayGoing by the dap count, it seems more likely that nobody's trying to hear you sucking Deion's dikk at every opportunity in this thread.
Sorry to break it to you my guy, but all the nut slurping of Prime's balls on here won't land you your ultimate goal of meeting him under these circumstances:
Maybe slurp dat nut with a little less vigor moving forward. Desperation isn't exactly attractive in a groupie. And brush your stinking teeth next time.
In year 2 he's getting hate.
In year 1 he got his credit. But year 2 he's going backwards.
And that reinforces my point a bit. Sure, it's nice to go from a 1-4 win team to a 4-7 win team in year 1, but can a coach then take the next steps from there each year?
That's where the determination of whether or not a coach did an impressive job can really be made, probably after year 2.
Year after year after year. Lots of coaches can be a one year wonder (e.g. Brady Hoke (took a 7 win rich rod team and won 11 games including the Orange bowl his first year), Mel Tucker, etc).