When Canelo pulls this off on Golovkin
Nah, Brook was pushing Porter around easily in the clinches, I wouldn't call him the strongest at all.
Thurman wasn't supposed to "hold his own" vs Porter....he was supposed to show that Porter wasn't on his level, which he couldnt do, and barely escaped with a W over Porter. Spence is much better than Shawn Porter
Spence beats Thurman clearly, just like he did Brook. Thurman is going to be on his bike early and often with Spence, and is going to lose via KO. Spence KO's don't stop once the "competition increases"
Yall did this same thing with Brook, acting as if Spence isn't the bigger and more technically proficient fighter, so yall are going to get the same results.....another doubter who's going to get that work once he's finally ready to face #TheTruth
#Thur-MANDOWN
#TruthSeekers
He fought fire with fire (which was stupid) but it made for an entertaining fight. Let's be real bruh, the fight was competitive but that not close. Thurman won pretty clean. And about Spence, you better worry about your mans cleaning up his D. He's gonna get hit with shyt he's never felt before & I'm not as confident as you as to how he'll react or if he can even take it. Getting hit from Kell Brook & Keith Thurman are two totally different beasts & you know it. All of these other fighters have talked about Thurman's power before getting in the ring & their ring actions & interviews tell a completely different story post fight. That Winky turtle defense won't work famo. He's gonna have to add or show more wrinkles in his game.
That shyt ain't even expressive
I dnt see how showing a Canelo defensive highlight against a weight drained beyond shot Angulo will make you think he can do the same thing with GGG. If he try that pretty shyt with GGG he will be slumped.
When Canelo pulls this off on Golovkin
I'm talking more than held his own as far as not getting bullied
), he was ill prepared for Brook, Brook's one win over Porter was > anything Spence has done as a pro, we couldn't say Spence was elite (even though our Boxing eyes weren't lying to us, yours did to you).
we heard this all before from you breh....how did that turn out last time for you?
Broner: I Don't Get Enough Respect; I'm the One Kids Wanna Be Now
By Keith Idec
Adrien Broner mostly has been commended for his decision to fight Mike Garcia next.
Garcia has to move up in weight, from 135 pounds to 140, to make it happen. A textbook technician with power, Garcia still is a dangerous opponent for Broner (33-2, 24 KOs), who seems better suited to fight at junior welterweight (140 pounds) than welterweight (147).
The praise for accepting Garcia aside, Broner believes he doesn’t get enough credit for going up against Adrian Granados in his last fight.
Broner beat Granados (18-5-2, 12 KOs), a formidable former sparring partner, by split decision in a tough, 10-round welterweight fight February 18 in Cincinnati. The 27-year-old Broner boxed the rugged Granados just two fights after Granados stopped previously unbeaten 140-pound contender Amir Imam (20-1, 17 KOs) in the eighth round in November 2015.
“With all due respect to every reporter out there,” Broner said during a recent conference call, “I just feel I don’t get as much respect as I should because my last fight, the guy that I fought, he was a guy that a lot of people skipped past. And I’m like, ‘You know what? I’m gonna fight him because everybody feels like I’m not taking tough fights.’ So I knew he was tough, and I fought him and I beat him. And now I’m taking another tough fight.”
The Cincinnati native, one of the most polarizing people in boxing, doesn’t think people should be surprised he agreed to fight the hard-hitting Garcia (36-0, 30 KOs). Before boxing Granados, the previous 3½ years for Broner included facing former IBF welterweight champion Shawn Porter, ex-WBA super lightweight champ Khabib Allakhverdiev, Argentine knockout artist Marcos Maidana, and moving up two divisions, from lightweight to welterweight, to oppose Paulie Malignaggi.
The former four-division champion doesn’t sense that he is appreciated enough overall by boxing reporters and fans, particularly for what he has accomplished during the past four years.
“I just feel like they don’t put enough respect on my name,” Broner said. “All of the accomplishments I’ve accomplished in this game – I’m the one the kids wanna be now. Because coming up, everybody wanted to be like Floyd that’s my age. Now, coming up all the kids wanna be like Adrien Broner. So it’s OK, though. This fight is just to show people I’m still here and I’ve still got what it takes to take over the game of boxing after Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao [retire].”
The embattled Broner, who has had numerous brushes with the law, recognizes that he’ll take criticism for making such statements. His detractors don’t faze him, though.
“I love it. I love it,” Broner said. “I’ve faced adversity so many times in this game. Sometimes I fell short, but I got right back up and I kept fighting.”
- See more at: Broner: I Don't Get Enough Respect; I'm the One Kids Wanna Be Now - Boxing News
It was close.
I scored it for Porter, Thurman was booed by the fans when the cards were announced, Porter landed more punches, and all 3 judges had it 7-5 for Thurman....that's a close fight breh
You're a Thurman fan....of course you think that. It was super close. Thurman did not prove that he wasn't slightly better than Porter at all. Brook's win over Porter was clearer than Thurman's win.
I've heard this from you before:
What happened?
You gave all that analysis as to why Spence wasn't The Truth, how he wouldn't be able to beat Shook, how his chin responds will be answered vs Shook, if his opponent had power...he'd be in trouble (Shook has power, what happened?
Spence did exactly what we told you he was going to do....destroy Kell Brook. You, on the other hand, said you were going to give Spence his props for doing what you said he couldn't, but now you pulling back out the same stance you repeated ad nauseam of how Spence aint really #TheTruth, regardless of the fact Spence proved you totally wrong
So, unfortunately for you, you're gonna have to stand in the mirror, face #TheTruth again, and have another fighter you're claiming is better than Spence end up losing via KO
No we don't know this. Not at all. They haven't even faced the same opponent except Porter.
Speaking of Porter, lets see what he says about their power comparision
He just put them on the same level, so to say they are 2 totally different beasts would be incorrect
#TruthSeekers
It was close.
I scored it for Porter, Thurman was booed by the fans when the cards were announced, Porter landed more punches, and all 3 judges had it 7-5 for Thurman....that's a close fight breh
You're a Thurman fan....of course you think that. It was super close. Thurman did not prove that he wasn't slightly better than Porter at all. Brook's win over Porter was clearer than Thurman's win.
I've heard this from you before:
What happened?
You gave all that analysis as to why Spence wasn't The Truth, how he wouldn't be able to beat Shook, how his chin responds will be answered vs Shook, if his opponent had power...he'd be in trouble (Shook has power, what happened?
Spence did exactly what we told you he was going to do....destroy Kell Brook. You, on the other hand, said you were going to give Spence his props for doing what you said he couldn't, but now you pulling back out the same stance you repeated ad nauseam of how Spence aint really #TheTruth, regardless of the fact Spence proved you totally wrong
So, unfortunately for you, you're gonna have to stand in the mirror, face #TheTruth again, and have another fighter you're claiming is better than Spence end up losing via KO
No we don't know this. Not at all. They haven't even faced the same opponent except Porter.
Speaking of Porter, lets see what he says about their power comparision
He just put them on the same level, so to say they are 2 totally different beasts would be incorrect
#TruthSeekers
So you're using the crowd who's filled with casuals as your base. Ok nikka you win lol. Porter lost by at least 3 rounds but I'll let you slide because that's your dude. The difference between you & me is I can call fights down the middle for the most part even though I might favor a fighter or style more. You're the same dude that had Robert Easter beating Commey in a fight where Commey should've gotten the nod And you know I like Easter. You & others are trying to anoint Spence as the heir apparent before he even fought anyone. I wouldn't say Spence destroyed Brook either. He stopped him in a competitive fight where he started pulling away. I gave Spence his props & said he was elite. It doesn't take away from the fact he has glaring faults at the elite level & will run into major issues when someone exploits them. I think Thurman's style will give him fits & with Spence's faults I think he's gonna lose. It has nothing to do with backtracking or anything else you're making up
Makes sense why he was caping for Troy King, after looking over these receipts he sounds just like him
