I've never cared for that half face thing, other than that it's good.
So, you're gonna dismiss the fact that the judges all had it 7-5 for Thurman....which is the very definition of a close fight....and only address the fact I said the crowd booed him?
Come on breh, explain to me how Porter lost by at least 3 rounds, which is impossible first of all, but the fact Porter outlanded him and all 3 judges had Thurman winning 7-5, to you it wasnt a close fight at all?
Obviously not if you said Porter lost by at least 3 rounds to Thurman
Really?
So, there were 4 rounds that could've went either way....but you're saying my card was wrong for having Easter winning a fight YOU only had Commey winning by 1 point in.
Then, let's address that 1 point edge you gave: The round that gave Commey the win on your card (the 8th) was because of a false KD that never occurred, being that Easter never actually touched the canvas, so it should've been a 10-9 round on your card
Also, a quick count shows that you gave Easter 6 rounds (1, 4, 5, 6, 7, & 12) then gave Commey 6 rounds (2, 3, 8, 9, 10, & 11)...so what are you talking about breh? Without a false KD, you had the fight a draw....and you're saying there are 4 rounds which are toss up's which means you can see the fight going to either fighter since you only had it 114-113.
Were we right in our perception of Spence, or were you?
We said Spence was elite way before a fight with Brook, you claimed if he beat Brook then he'd be elite, bc you didn't think he was able too....................who was right all along?
He literally broke bones in that man's face and made him bow down and submit to him. If that's not destruction, what is it?
Congratulations.....you finally found out what we knew all along
You said Brook would do it. He failed. Now, you're saying the same things, again, except you're just exchanging Shook's name with Run Time's.
I didn't make up anything breh, I just posted the receipts.....receipts never lie, because they're your own words. We even had the Boxing Gawd @Yuzo swoop down from the mountains to drop gifs and explanations as to why Spence was going to beat Brook to you, but you didn't care bc you were fully convinced that Spence would lose to Brook
So, it seems like you're taking the same path of denial for a Thurman/Spence altercation, which is fine. Just be ready to face #TheTruth after this fight ends with another man down.....Thur-MAN DOWN
#TruthSeekers
Who controlled fight? Who was the EFFECTIVE aggressor? Who landed the clean & effective blows? Who's defense was better? These are things most casuals don't look for & you know it. Using the crowd to prove you point isn't accurate in this case. You trying to prove this is showing your own bias right now About the Commey/Easter fight, that might not have been the best example but my point still stands. That fight was wayyy closer than Thurman/Porter where I thought Commey should've won. And that knockdown wasn't a real knockdown but my point still stands because of the swing rounds & what you saw. I'm not the only one that thought Commey won but I won't name names 
He has flaws & was untested. He beat a top WW & NOW he's a proven elite talent & fighter. I see nothing wrong with waiting for a fighter to prove he's one of the best. You guys were right about the fight but have yet to come to terms with his flaws & another elite fighter exploiting it. Brook didn't fight a smart fight & I blame his corner for some of that. When Spence made slight adjustments Brook did nothing but keep fighting the same way. He didn't feint much, he didn't vary his right hands up, & he didn't throw many combos. Most of his shots were one at a time & at the elite level that's not good enough. And you keep making shyt up again I never "fully convinced that Brook would beat Spence". I said I slightly favored him because of his experience & Spence's lack of. Fighters get hurt all the time bruh & Brook did quit but he wasnt "destroyed" or "dominated". That fight was competitive but the tide turned & he quit. For the record I'm not in denial about anything. I can list Thurman's flaws & name fighters whom I'd favor to beat him. It seems you're in denial about one of your squad members flaws & are caught up in his hype.
Everyone talks about Spence flaws and what Keith will exploit but what about Keith's flaws that Spence would exploit...when did Keith become the exception
Most of the time they're not bad. But this one looks fukked up cause little g is a goofy lookin muthafukker. Can't put him next to guy with movie star looks like Canelo. shyt came out lookin like
You think the Blue Machine yet again surprises everyone?how do you know it wont be indongo vs garcia/broner winner?
So judges get things right all the time now huh? How many times have we all agreed that the right person won but the scorecards were off??? Valdez vs Marriaga ring a bell? And now you're using punch stats to support your post
About the Commey/Easter fight, that might not have been the best example but my point still stands. That fight was wayyy closer than Thurman/Porter where I thought Commey should've won. And that knockdown wasn't a real knockdown but my point still stands because of the swing rounds & what you saw. I'm not the only one that thought Commey won but I won't name names
this is when you know you , but you still gotta keep going, bc you don't wanna admit you're wrong brehs
) but then question why I had Easter winning
And nikka just because you jumped on the Spence bandwagon doesn't mean I'm required to
I just got on the Spence wagon?
If only Thurman had the same confidence as his stans...we would've seen him in the ring with both Spence & Porter in the same year
Yep...priced himself wayyyyyyyyyyyyy out to avoid that fight. And amazingly, he tricked enough people to actually believe Spence didn't deserve the fight, but yet all the other opponents Thurman faced did
Beating Spence, a highly touted contender, former Olympian, & the person alot of people (fans and media) think is next up to run Welterweight since Floyd has retired, doesn't do anything for his career, but beating "Leonard Bundwho?"and a washed up Luis Collazo did?
So what did Leonard "Bundwho?" do for Thurman's career that Errol Spence wouldn't do more for? But yet, Thurman fought him, but shouldn't fight Spence
Say amateur careers/Olympic credentials don't matter or increase your prestige coming into the pros as a young contender brehs
Are you really gonna sit here in your #Thurminator Shades and act like Thurman fighting Spence wouldn't matter?
Really?
If Thurman agreed to fight Errol Spence right now, it would be on PBC on NBC on Saturday at 8pm....and would be touted as a big fight and great matchup
Errol Spence is better right now than anyone Thurman has ever faced. You gotta be kidding me.
The point I was making was that he fought THEM, but yet he's too big to fight Spence?
Nobody in their right mind would pick neither Bundwho? nor Collazo to beat Spence in 2015, but yet Spence shouldn't be able to get a fight with Thurman right now, while they were allowed too?
This nikka Thurman hiding in plain sight from Spence (and from Porter until further notice), but because he has wavy hair and talks with a lisp...nikkas talking down on Spence. Like HE'S the running from the challenge or don't wanna fight
Say Spence doesn't deserve to fight Thurman, but then turn around and believe Beterbiev deserves to fight a much more accomplished fighter in Kovalev brehs
Which one is it?
For some Boxers, their talent is glaring and evident....Spence fit the bill, so we already stamped him
how do you know it wont be indongo vs garcia/broner winner?
