They are paying him accordingly.. Thats why he's getting a career high payday of $10 million... according to his ppv flop and merchandise sells
The problem isn't us thinking its a great offer .. The problem is people thinking its a low ball offer.. He has done nothing to prove this offer isn't fair.. cant compare him to Pacquiao.. cant compare his offer to anyone else.. name any other fighter that was the obvious B side that made more than $10 million that isn't Pacquiao...
I get what you are saying, but my point is that until we truly know the numbers of what they are budgeting the revenue at, we can't say $10 million is fair or not.
If it turns out $10 million is say 1/3 of the pot, I would say it is fair. But if $10 million turns out to be 10% of the pot, GGG is not wrong telling GB to kick rocks.
That is what I mean when I compare it to the Pacquiao situation. The casuals thought Pacquiao was getting a great deal at $40 million flat fee. It sounds great, but we didn't know how big the pot was. If Pacquiao made $40 million and Floyd got $60 million, then I think we could all say it would have been a fair deal. But of what the total pot ended up being, $40 million was nothing.
And when it comes to fair split, I argue it should be when a fighter directly affects the revenue of the fight. I don't think Pacquiao should have had to pay Bradley anything crazy special, because Bradley doesn't affect the revenue of the fight that much. But in this case, I think the GGG-Canelo matchup directly affects Canelo's income. Because of GGG, Canelo will make more. Canelo should still get the larger split, but GGG should be compensated for making Canelo more money.
We could go all day/everyday arguing about what is fair. As long as the revenue is a fair split of the total event revenue, no one should have a problem, regardless of whether GGG makes less than $10 million, exactly $10 million, or more than $10 million.