I wouldnt be so sure about that. They were able to pay Swift (coming off of dominate win over Zab) and Matthysse (who just smashed Peterson)....why wouldnt they be able to pay 2 guys coming off losses and another guy who struggled in an irrelevant fight? What you have to realize is....Broner and Mares need to be grateful to have the opportunity to have return fights on PPV. Khan....he aint runnin shyt....so he better either be satisfied or fight over in the UK his next fight.
The separate/free Sho card would work though but the PPV makes more sense because Floyd is the cash cow and his PPVs take precedent over free Sho cards. The PPV setup is right and provides storyline into May's next possible opponent. I dont know if it will happen but if it doesnt, the deciding factor is going to be more than just raw numbers from a purse perspective.
Well then, why would the head of Showtime say himself that the fight isnt happening?
And it doesnt matter if you're coming off a loss or not, it's about what you're bringing to the table. Broner got almost 2 million to fight Gavin Rees on FREE cable.......you're not gonna be able to pay him less than that. Khan also makes alot of money guaranteed per fight. You cant compare either of them to Danny, or especially Lucas Matthysse, because Broner himself is a larger draw than Danny Garcia was at the time he fought Matthysse. Let's not forget, Broner had 3 of the most watched free Showtime boxing shows in their history......going against Rees/Malignaggi/Maidana. Put Khan vs Broner on there and it's selling a PPV that most people DONT want to buy as it's currently constructed with Floyd vs Maidana and Abner Mares on it
Would I like to see Khan vs Broner on there.....yes. But financially can it make sense if they not doing Floyd vs Canelo PPV numbers?