Paulie Maliggnagi summed up today's boxing environment recently when he said something like, "It's prize fighting DUMMY. I fight for MONEY." These guys aren't out here fighting for legacy and their place in history anymore. That hasn't been the main motivator for boxers, or even a major one for many of them, in quite some time. Floyd doesn't give a fukk if anyone says he should've fought Pac, or Martinez, or whoever. He just made $32 million to beat Guerrero, styled on him, and got to 44-0.I'm not a boxing expert but I have a question. Son is 44-0 right? Why is it that people are mad at him for not losing, rarely getting hit, and "picking people he can't beat"?
If I was a boxer, and I was Mayweather's next challenger, then I lost to someone who Mayweather previously destroyed, why should he want to fight me?
The general public wants boxers to take on the toughest competition, look to build legacies, and give us classics. But what happens when you do that? You end up like Nonito Donaire, De La Hoya at the end, and Roy Jones when he came down in weight too quickly. And what happens when you control the environment and take calculated risks? You end up rich, popular, and perceived as invincible, like Pac (til recently), Floyd, and the Klitschkos.
One more thing: When it looks too easy, the casual fans say the competition isn't good enough and sometimes that's just the best competition out there. Right now, there's no one that can truly challenge Floyd.