Not saying that you bytch ass Troll, I'm just not giving Trout props for his weight draining ass beating a shot blow up lww in Cotto by the skin of his teeth, and I damn sure aint giving Props to Canelo for beating that overhyped fighter in Trout, in a fight where he clearly got his head boxed off and won no more than 4 rounds, and the press sitting ringside vehemently felt he lost
yeah but he shouldn't be having stamina/conditioning problems at his age..no matter how his skills are
So you'd rather watch Floyd fight tomato cans on his way out?Floyd needs Canelo for his legacy
So Canelo does more for Floyd's legacy than say Martinez...should he come down. Or Bradley at WW. Floyd is 36. Any legacy building is pretty much done...but for the sake of argument...why is Canelo most qualified?
There arent any great fighters out here honestly. I just dont see how Canelo is viewed as a legacy builder when he just got on the scene.
So fighting Canelo Replaces him fighting Pac? You saying Canelo in the same league. My nikka I'm appalled...Floyd can't avoid Canelo and yes he does need him, not for the money but for his legacy...The Pac fight never happening was a huge blackeye for both of their careers and the sport...After that debacle, failing to now secure the second biggest prize fight that can be made would all but solidify his legacy as a ducker and an opportunist in the court of public oppinion...
I am a big fan of dude but there is zero excuse for not fighting Canelo...Floyd's had multiple fights at 154 and even held a strap...If his age is a problem then he shouldn't have signed that showtime contract...Either take on a challenge or retire...
Not saying that you bytch ass Troll, I'm just not giving Trout props for his weight draining ass beating a shot blow up lww in Cotto by the skin of his teeth, and I damn sure aint giving Props to Canelo for beating that overhyped fighter in Trout, in a fight where he clearly got his head boxed off and won no more than 4 rounds, and the press sitting ringside vehemently felt he lost
nikka what fukking fight you was watching?
I'm appalled by your reading comprehension...So fighting Canelo Replaces him fighting Pac? You saying Canelo in the same league. My nikka I'm appalled...
nikka you said he didnt fight pacq so he should fight canelo. nikka just fought a fukking jmw instead of his usual jw and ww.I'm appalled by your reading comprehension...
Where the fukk did I say or imply Canelo replaces Pac?
All I'm saying is Canelo is the best possible fight for Floyd that CAN BE MADE...He has no excuse not to fight that kid...
A fight where he made shot Cotto look like sweat pea at times, and lost 5 rounds to the shot oversize fighter
By Rene Umanzor
Former four division world champion Juan Manuel Marquez has stated that Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez (42-0-1, 30KOs) should not be regarded as one of the best in the world because of this past Saturday's unification win over Austin Trout. Canelo unified the WBA/WBC junior middleweight titles with a close twelve round unanimous decision at the Alamodome in San Antonio, Texas.
"A win over Trout [does] not confirm that [Canelo] is the best, because there are higher quality opponents out there. This [is] an important step for Canelo and [a win over Trout gives him] access to bigger fights. He has to face the right opponents and prove that he is a great fighter - opponents like Sergio 'Maravilla' Martinez, Vanes Martirosyan, Erislandy Lara. He has to fight against those kind of opponents to prove that he's among the best in the world. That's where it should be confirmed [that he's great] and where [he will] gain greater credibility," said Marquez.