3 fights and normally DAZN doesn't pay 80 to Joshua either, the Saudi money played into that if I know it right. Besides that like it or not Joshua creates more revenue than Wilder hence he gets paid more. Of course, we can argue about the extent of it, let's just say a 60-40 would be fair. I doN't like to argue about purses for hours and whatnot but yeah I feel that's fair. they can't lowball Wilder cause he is the highest income fight to Joshua next to Fury but it's not a 50-50 either cause one of them is clearly making more money.
If Wilder would have gotten 50 for each fights and Joshua like 70 that'd been entirely fair imo.
It's been reported as 3 fight deal and a 4 fight deal. $120 million either way.
Look at the position Ruiz was left in. Beats Joshua, and in the rematch is left with 14% of the total purse split. Andy is not Wilder; Wilder has the higher profile, PPV track record, ticket sales, and holds the WBC belt, why would he take that [120mil] deal? His team is not going to jump on an offer like Ruiz did being a last minute replacement.
Also, can we get an estimation of how much greater a draw Joshua is? When we tally up (PPV sales x price) for each, can we see how much revenue they're generating? I'm guessing it's not enough for Joshua to demand a complete lion share. At this point, it's becoming clear Joshua is a greater draw than Fury or Wilder, so I do believe he'd get a higher split, but it's absurd to make it seem like he can call all the shots.
Really, all I'm saying is that the offer wasn't fair, and I think that's being revealed now that we're seeing how much money and demand is being generated from these heavyweight bouts. There isn't a fight greater than Wilder Joshua right now, and the 120 million deal doesn't make sense just as the original 50 million flat fee deal for Joshua doesn't make sense.