I think Hollow is vastly overrated. He's one of those guys that okay-good at everything, but he's not exceptional at any one thing. Bars are good, not mindblowing. Angles are probably what he's best at, but even those can be done a little sloppily. Rebuttals are good, but there's a bunch of people good at that now. Aggression is cool, but comes off kinda corny at times too. Plus most of his battles aren't really all that. His Lux battle and Pass battle are classic. His performance vs. Big T was great. Other than that, I don't really go back to Hollow battles. They lack replay value. Plus he has a tendency to say cringeworthy lines, with an annoying voice.
He's good but I dunno. Overrated to me.
So I'm with you about 100 on that analysis of Hollow. But reading through it, I don't understand how you can then say Roc is indisputed. Hollow is ok or good in a bunch of categories. Roc is good with aggression, and it's that aggression that sells a pretty weak pen. He's not with the angles, not with the scheming, very basic with the punches, and just flat out screams sometimes. I mentioned the abundance of cringe-worthy bars he lays out when trying to be clever.
As for replay value? I rewatch the second Clips battle (my favorite Roc performance) and maybe the Ill Will joint. Are dudes in here watching Roc battles every month and getting that classic feel?
So my question to you (and anyone putting him as the clear number 1): why?
I know I tried to elicit this same information earlier this year, but nikkas just got snotty and off topic.