A. Second bold is useless, battlers been bytching since the inception of this sport. They’re all a bunch of crybabies.
1. I’m just using deductive reasoning. Either Smack is losing money to spite his battlers on purpose by putting battles on the app, or this is a more beneficial arrangement for him and his business.
2. It makes perfect sense. If your aim is to gain exposure, there is still a place for people to see your content that you’ve already been paid to perform. Unless nikkas were getting a cut of URL YouTube streams, I don’t see how this is any different. Jaz is complaining that people don’t even know she battled. That’s just as much Jaz fault as it is no YouTube battles.
A. It's not useless since URL just lost one of their hottest battlers to competition because they leave all the battles on the app and that battler wants Youtube exposure.
1. You said he makes no money off youtube because of the cussing. Just admit you pulled that outta your ass. Of course locking battles behind the app is more beneficial to Smack. No one has argued against that. They can cap a battlers pay on top of eating all the money from ppl subbing to the app.
2.Yes nikkas was getting paid based on views. Either Arsonal or Hitman mentioned it in their battles before, when Smack was still releasing battles on youtube. I want to say it was Arsonal was talking that type of shyt. I'm sure one of the more hardcore nikkas can back that up. I remember them dropping a bar about it.
That's also beside the point, as stated earlier, youtube views are how a bunch of rappers leverage their brand to negotiate.
I'm done with this argument. If you can't understand why a battler would prefer putting their battle on youtube with a billion users instead of an app with probably 250k ppl on it max, who are already battlerrap fans, this will go nowhere. We just goin in circles. Carry on.
