according to another forum, this scene wasnt in the movie:
maybe it's during the bruce investigation
maybe it's during the bruce investigation
You don't know what your talking about breh . I'm a huge superman fan from young and superman isn't as simple and corny as your making him to be . The guy had a storyline where he got killed in it during the 90s , a story in which he beat doomsday to death to stop him . The. New 52 superman is facing the same issues , even prior to the new 52 superman had some dark stories and was involved in mature storylines such as his dad passing . Like the guy you quoted said just because you think superman should be that way doesn't mean that's how he has to be .So-called reviews? They're reviews and there are no rules or handbook they have to follow, sorry. You can have expectations for what you want in a movie, especially when it is based on well known source material.
Making Superman dark especially is just dumb. He is the super hero starter kit for everyone. He's for fukkin' kids! Making him all emo, sullen and suicidal is not anyone's idea of what the character should be. What's the S on his chest in Kryptonian language supposedly stand for again?
nikka shut the fukk up with all that sentimental bullshyt. The movie was garbage plain and simple.The problem with these so-called reviews just like the one with Kevin Smith is that they complain over what THEY expect all superhero films to be and not for what the film individually WANTS it to be. You cannot say a film is a "bad film" because you dislike its tone and want it to be a happy tone. That's not what the filmmakers are gunning for. They do not want an action comedy. They do not want a family fun joy ride. They wanted an adult-mature film that delves into modern day mythology.
As I said before, I can pass if people say it is bad editing or say they did not like someone's acting or even critique about the direction or parts of the screenplay. But when you saying it is dark, it is grim, it is joyless. THAT IS THE POINT. That is what they wanted. These are the SAME KIND of criticisms that people complained about for EMPIRE STRIKES BACK. About it didn't have hope and fun like the original Star Wars. That it left on a cliffhanger. That it was always dreary and hopeless and the heroes did not win. That it was too dark. Nothing about how revolutionary, how ambitious, and how well directed the movie was. Today it is viewed as one of the greatest films ever made.
If you don't want your movies to be serious and adult... fine. But do not bash a film for its INTENT. Criticize it for things that they intended to do and it didn't work. But to say it is depressing and hopeless, you do not deserve to be a critic.
And to add, some of these critics really are power-tripping. They truly trying to derail the movie and making ALL the excuses they could muster to undermine its success. I read an article today by a critic upset at the success of the film claiming the movie is the cinematic version of DONALD TRUMP. And the fans are no different from Trump fans. That is a disgusting use of comparison just because that individual didn't so-called care for the movie. But there's constant articles that really trying their all to smear this movie.
I was thinking that it was still burnt from Batman BeginsWhat are yalls theory on what happened to the Wayne mansion
They rebuilt it. It was where he was living in TDKRI was thinking that it was still burnt from Batman Begins
He's already said he doesn't even like superman as a character before so I wouldn't take his opinion seriously.You don't know what your talking about breh . I'm a huge superman fan from young and superman isn't as simple and corny as your making him to be . The guy had a storyline where he got killed in it during the 90s , a story in which he beat doomsday to death to stop him . The. New 52 superman is facing the same issues , even prior to the new 52 superman had some dark stories and was involved in mature storylines such as his dad passing . Like the guy you quoted said just because you think superman should be that way doesn't mean that's how he has to be .
Also if you pay attention to the movie superman was trying to be a beacon of hope but the more cynical modern world was distrusting of a godlike alien showing up and interfering in human events
You don't know what your talking about breh . I'm a huge superman fan from young and superman isn't as simple and corny as your making him to be . The guy had a storyline where he got killed in it during the 90s , a story in which he beat doomsday to death to stop him . The. New 52 superman is facing the same issues , even prior to the new 52 superman had some dark stories and was involved in mature storylines such as his dad passing . Like the guy you quoted said just because you think superman should be that way doesn't mean that's how he has to be .
Also if you pay attention to the movie superman was trying to be a beacon of hope but the more cynical modern world was distrusting of a godlike alien showing up and interfering in human events
THANK YOU.The problem with these so-called reviews just like the one with Kevin Smith is that they complain over what THEY expect all superhero films to be and not for what the film individually WANTS it to be. You cannot say a film is a "bad film" because you dislike its tone and want it to be a happy tone. That's not what the filmmakers are gunning for. They do not want an action comedy. They do not want a family fun joy ride. They wanted an adult-mature film that delves into modern day mythology.
As I said before, I can pass if people say it is bad editing or say they did not like someone's acting or even critique about the direction or parts of the screenplay. But when you saying it is dark, it is grim, it is joyless. THAT IS THE POINT. That is what they wanted. These are the SAME KIND of criticisms that people complained about for EMPIRE STRIKES BACK. About it didn't have hope and fun like the original Star Wars. That it left on a cliffhanger. That it was always dreary and hopeless and the heroes did not win. That it was too dark. Nothing about how revolutionary, how ambitious, and how well directed the movie was. Today it is viewed as one of the greatest films ever made.
If you don't want your movies to be serious and adult... fine. But do not bash a film for its INTENT. Criticize it for things that they intended to do and it didn't work. But to say it is depressing and hopeless, you do not deserve to be a critic.
And to add, some of these critics really are power-tripping. They truly trying to derail the movie and making ALL the excuses they could muster to undermine its success. I read an article today by a critic upset at the success of the film claiming the movie is the cinematic version of DONALD TRUMP. And the fans are no different from Trump fans. That is a disgusting use of comparison just because that individual didn't so-called care for the movie. But there's constant articles that really trying their all to smear this movie.
nikka shut the fukk up with all that sentimental bullshyt. The movie was garbage plain and simple.
Superman became less popular because the 90s was the rise of the anti hero and characters like venom. It's as simple as that.isn't it unusual that superman became less popular in the 90's heading into the new millennium, precisely when writers tried to make him more dark and bizarre?
do you know ANYONE that wears a new 52 superman shirt? i don't.
Keep it trill people like you are the minority of the audience. That's why it didn't play well with some people. We remember good doing, hopeful, slightly goofy Superman. We didn't read these gloomy stories about him.You don't know what your talking about breh . I'm a huge superman fan from young and superman isn't as simple and corny as your making him to be . The guy had a storyline where he got killed in it during the 90s , a story in which he beat doomsday to death to stop him . The. New 52 superman is facing the same issues , even prior to the new 52 superman had some dark stories and was involved in mature storylines such as his dad passing . Like the guy you quoted said just because you think superman should be that way doesn't mean that's how he has to be .
Also if you pay attention to the movie superman was trying to be a beacon of hope but the more cynical modern world was distrusting of a godlike alien showing up and interfering in human events
This was dumb to me too. She could simply feign amazement and say "yeah she looks like me but I'm obviously not 100 years old." What reason would anyone have to doubt that she isn't 100 years old?Same reason why no one else exposed themselves if we going down that route. Other metahumans are around but no one wanted to step up. Hell WonderWoman didn't even wanna step up but she was almost forced to since she got exposed. Turkish Airlines coach was in her future.
You're so full of shyt.Keep it trill people like you are the minority of the audience. That's why it didn't play well with some people. We remember good doing, hopeful, slightly goofy Superman. We didn't read these gloomy stories about him.
You stupid bytch you had to quote him didn't you. fukk youYou know you DEAD right?
1- them DC Stans ain't gonna sit for this and will attack you into Bolivia.
2- they gonna snitch to them people's!!
They've gotten mad in here for less!!
It's been real breh!