HipHopStan
Top 113 Poster
Alright, brehs, the media blackout begins now. I'll talk to you all in this thread next weekend. Until then, I'm out.
Will smith?How the mighty have fallen, you would never see Tom cruise doing this
This gotta be the lamest argument considering in BOTH BvS and Civil War, they addressing the total destruction and lives lost (which technically, Avengers caused way more) are the central point of their films conflict.
And you are completely wrong about Superman being indifferent. I mean lets ignore the fact that he literally SACRIFICED and TURNED HIMSELF IN for the sake of saving humanity in the 1st place. Or the fact that his emotions got the best of him in Smallville at the thought of Zod harming his mother, and still tried to save people while in Smallville. Or the fact during all that time he JUST OFFICIALLY started as Superman...like only for half a day. Then lets not forget that the vast MAJORITY of the destruction happened even before Superman & Zod fought because of that world terra-forming machine. Or his vow he made with the general at the very end of the film promising he's there to protect the people and won't be a threat. To say he was "indifferent" is clearly incorrect. He wouldn't of SNAPPED ZOD'S neck if he didn't care about human lives. The destruction in itself is both impart of Zod's determination to kill every single human and Superman being a VIRTUAL AMATEUR without understanding the consequences.... but all of that is null and void because that is the CENTRAL PART being addressed in BvS which is why BOTH Batman and Lex Luthor have an issue with him.
You know I never thought about it like that.It's not incorrect because he never bothers. In the OG Avengers movie and in Age Of Ultron you can clearly see them prioritizing the safety of the people around them first and foremost. It doesn't mean they can save everyone, and indeed lives are lost, but they bothered. Regardless of whatever hamfisted scenes MoS employs to give that idea of character development (killing Zod is one of them because nothing feels natural about that entire setup, his vow to the general is another because he's talking about the general needing to trust him after he just completely destroyed the drone tracking him), it never sells. Even the "he's just starting out" excuse is kinda weak because the movie does establish he's been helping out here and there all over the world (like the oil rig), but again no sells it because that's about the first and the last time we really see him bother (up until that awful Zod scene).
And the fact that the sequel is trying to fix it only shows they're acknowledging they mishandled it. Similar to how in the Netflix Marvel shows they keep bringing up many people died and how extensive the damage was during the battle in New York as a reaction to people complaining the movie brushed over it too much, the other side of the coin. And it's good that they are trying to put things in context and fix it, but that doesn't mean I give them a pass for getting it wrong out of the gate.
And again, there are a ton of problems with the whole movie that extend far beyond Supes' characterization so in the end it's always a sum of parts to why the movie is complete crap, but that one probably hurts the most because it is such a simple thing to show him caring, or at least being bothered, but they all make it completely about his anger.
You know I never thought about it like that.
Shut. The.fukk.up.
Kindly shut the fukk up.I'm just kindly responding to the breh's kindly response to my kindly response to another breh's question.
Which, now that I think about it, almost sounds like a discussion, which is something that definitely sounds like the kind of thing that might happen on a message board.
Now one could argue the discussion is outplayed and whatnot, but one could also argue that if you feel that way you could just ignore it like other folks are doing and let the people who do want to participate in the conversation do their thing instead of bytching about it like a whiny kid.
I see you've finally come out and admitted you're just a marvel stan with that avi
Nope!
I see you've finally come out and admitted you're just a marvel stan with that avi
Guess my exposal finally made you accept it
It's not incorrect because he never bothers. In the OG Avengers movie and in Age Of Ultron you can clearly see them prioritizing the safety of the people around them first and foremost. It doesn't mean they can save everyone, and indeed lives are lost, but they bothered. Regardless of whatever hamfisted scenes MoS employs to give that idea of character development (killing Zod is one of them because nothing feels natural about that entire setup, his vow to the general is another because he's talking about the general needing to trust him after he just completely destroyed the drone tracking him), it never sells. Even the "he's just starting out" excuse is kinda weak because the movie does establish he's been helping out here and there all over the world (like the oil rig), but again no sells it because that's about the first and the last time we really see him bother (up until that awful Zod scene).
And the fact that the sequel is trying to fix it only shows they're acknowledging they mishandled it. Similar to how in the Netflix Marvel shows they keep bringing up many people died and how extensive the damage was during the battle in New York as a reaction to people complaining the movie brushed over it too much, the other side of the coin. And it's good that they are trying to put things in context and fix it, but that doesn't mean I give them a pass for getting it wrong out of the gate.
And again, there are a ton of problems with the whole movie that extend far beyond Supes' characterization so in the end it's always a sum of parts to why the movie is complete crap, but that one probably hurts the most because it is such a simple thing to show him caring, or at least being bothered, but they all make it completely about his anger.
I think you missed the ultimate point.... he cannot save EVERYONE and fight Zod at the same time. Unless you suggest how he CAN, please tell me. The problem you seem not understanding is you got two superpowered beings fighting.... it is useless to fight him in some empty construction sight because that said person intend is fight you right at that location OR start killing off people at will. BYSTANDERS just have to take the collateral damage to which Superman tried to limit yet, you are dealing with someone that could care less and doing MOST of the damage...such as the laser rays seen that toppled a skyscraper. Killing Zod is a character development for THIS film, BvS. In fact your entire complaint is being addressed and is the central POINT to the motivations of both Batman and Lex Luthor..... that is THEIR argument. But killing Zod was for a season it was either that or him killing humans and he made that choice and screamed in agony over it immediately... but you feel that he's supposedly apathetic.
You acting as if he had an OPTION to either fight Zod or save lives when he had no option BUT to fight Zod because he was going to SLAUGHTER everyone. If he could of remove Zod outside of the area he most likely would, but HOW.... this isn't Superman II where that version of Zod only wants SUPERMAN and therefore willing to fly wherever he goes. Zod made it clear that because all of his people are gone that he's going to kill every human.... it is a damned be damned situation. And again, mentioning AVENGERS is moot because CIVIL WAR addresses the SAME THING with WORST collateral damage than in MoS. Tens of thousands have been killed in many parts of the WORLD because of the actions of the Avengers, yes they tried to save SOME... but how you going to SIT there and claim that Superman acted like he didn't care of the number of lives lost when you got THIS scene??
YeahWill smith?