The Official Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice Movie Thread
- Thread starter Jello Biafra
- Start date
Roman Brady
Nobody Lives Forever
be be because they want to update him so bad. They don't realize you can still have superman be superman but in a gritty dark world. They think he needs to brood and grimace to fit in with the colour palette
Norrin Radd
To me, my board!
I'm eager to see if they treat characters like Flash and Green Lantern the same way.be be because they want to update him so bad. They don't realize you can still have superman be superman but in a gritty dark world. They think he needs to brood and grimace to fit in with the colour palette
Brandeezy
Superstar
What was the delay for again
Script rewrite
They said they won't and i doubt it with Shazam coming too
Roman Brady
Nobody Lives Forever
They shouldn't make the mistake of thinking being completely humorless and dry is being the anthisisis to marvel cuz it isnt. You are just going to produce another man of steel which lets face it could have been soooo much more but fell below the mark
They should've had Superman cracking jokes and smiling while 9/11 times by 7 was going on, that's the way to make a superhero moviebe be because they want to update him so bad. They don't realize you can still have superman be superman but in a gritty dark world. They think he needs to brood and grimace to fit in with the colour palette
Zod: I'm going to destroy your world
Supes:
And why kill the bad guy threatening to kill civilians when you can just
Last edited:
Kill Dat Noize
Banned
regardless we don't need to turn this into a MOS debate.
the fact is we don't need a movie, a FRANCHISE, where superman is depressed and angry all the time and doesn't talk much. it's not in the spirit of the character and more important it keeps him too distant.
the fact is we don't need a movie, a FRANCHISE, where superman is depressed and angry all the time and doesn't talk much. it's not in the spirit of the character and more important it keeps him too distant.
Brandeezy
Superstar
Ok that's cool, let's move on
You are trying to make the case that a Robin couldn't work on the big screen by bringing up failed attempts at Robin like he was the reason for the failure and not the shytty attempts at portraying him.
So 2 out of the 3 cinematic versions of Batman we have actually seen have included Robin? That kinda kills your own argument, bruh.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
Not following, could you articulate further/better? What kills my argument? I'm saying those Robin's were not good. What are you saying?
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
I don't know why they were shytty, but it's basic: until you see something done you have to say it is hard to do. Otherwise, someone would have done it properly by now.It's not like there is a shortage of Batman movies.
Burt Ward's Robin was exactly right for the time that he was in. No one criticizes that depiction of Robin as being "done badly".
And all of Schumacher's movies were mediocre but that had nothing to do with the inclusion of Robin.
What I am saying is that there have been 3 feature film versions of Batman so far: the 1966 film, the Burtonverse and the Nolanverse...2 of them have had a Robin.
Nolan's choice to not include Robin had nothing to do with how badly the previous ones were done but was just his own personal opinion on the type of character Batman was.
You were making it seem like there was some consensus opinion that every depiction of Robin sucked and as a result no one wanted to touch the character out of fear of failing at bringing Robin to the big screen which is not true in any way shape or form.
JGL was Robin