Well, I can only speak for myself, but without question I am more forgiving for Snyder because of the fact the cut that he wanted the studio wasn't going to allow because of the R-rating and the time length. Snyder himself said had he got more pull like a James Cameron then maybe but it was only logical for this to be edited down significantly. This was also the same issue with Age of Ultron, but the difference is that Disney wasn't going to allow Whedon to have a director's cut which probably would of make that film 10 times better.
Snyder did the best that he could with what he was forced to cut down, and to me it wasn't hard to follow and really anything that felt unnecessary. There's things that I PREFER, but I am not the storyteller. There's things in comic books that I PREFER as well as in any animated feature. But it is a filmmaker's choice and vision and you must respect that. With all of that said, it did exactly what was advertised.
This is like with Blade Runner.... Blade Runner was PUNISHED critically and was a financial flop. But because of the director's cut, it ended up being one of the greatest science fiction films ever made viewed by most people. And I am not saying the Ultimate Cut will be the greatest thing once released, but to me... the Ultimate Cut of Watchmen... the entire 3.5hrs of the movie is one of my all-time favorite comic book films ever.
Baring those things in mind, especially knowing going in, well before the 1st review, that this is NOT the definitive feature that Snyder wanted... I am less harsh on issues like editing and holes to a story. It was to be expected if you chop down 30 minutes of ANY film. It's why I hate those edited and shorten movies when they come on TV.