Trust Me
Coli Prophet
No we don't. Starting pitching was not our problem and Kimbrel was atrocious this year.
Kimbrel would’ve ate up innings instead of overworking guys like Gsellman and Seth early on in the year.
No we don't. Starting pitching was not our problem and Kimbrel was atrocious this year.
Terrible take. If all you got is not getting those two as 'not spending the Cespedes money' that's complaining just to complain. Kimbrel would not be brought here to eat up innings. He wasn't signing anywhere unless he was closing and that wasn't our problem, we needed closers and that's what he would be called to do and he would likely shyt the bed like he did in Chicago. It would be a bad idea to get him.Kimbrel would’ve ate up innings instead of overworking guys like Gsellman and Seth early on in the year.
Terrible take. If all you got is not getting those two as 'not spending the Cespedes money' that's complaining just to complain. Kimbrel would not be brought here to eat up innings. He wasn't signing anywhere unless he was closing and that wasn't our problem, we needed closers and that's what he would be called to do and he would likely shyt the bed like he did in Chicago. It would be a bad idea to get him.
what are degrom chances of winning the cy young again?
When Kimbrel was finally signed Diaz had yet to implode. And he sucked anyway so we would be stuck with him now paying him a lot not to close for us going forward. Signing him would have been counter productive.Did you just say that closing wasn’t our problem this year?
And you’re good with the Wilpons eating the insurance money and not bringing in an arm and/or bat at the deadline? For our last wild card push? Because essentially that’s what they did. And they’ll CONTINUE to eat the insurance money and not put shyt back into the team. I don’t know wtf you’re seeing here. By your post, you were ok with us not picking up a bat or pitching at the deadline. Am I reading that right?
When Kimbrel was finally signed Diaz had yet to implode. And he sucked anyway so we would be stuck with him now paying him a lot not to close for us going forward. Signing him would have been counter productive.
They picked up Stroman, did you forget that?
So we should just re-up him before he pitches a full season in a Met uniform? Why? He pitched worse for us than he did TO but you just want to throw him a bag anyway?Stroman was making chump change this past year and we still haven’t committed to him. I’ll give you one guess why that is.
So we should just re-up him before he pitches a full season in a Met uniform? Why? He pitched worse for us than he did TO but you just want to throw him a bag anyway?
Uh this off-season how many players have received extensions or signed free agent deals?Who said throw him a bag? If you lock him up this offseason, chances are you’ll spend less than if you wait until after the 2020 season. I mean.. since that’s all the Wilpons care about.. right? Or did they bring him in with the intent of flipping him? Which means they never intended on giving him a new contract?
Which is what everyone pretty much thinks is gonna happen. But keep on being blind to the way the Wilpons work. It’s cool. It’ll be a lot less stressful for you as a met fan.
Uh this off-season how many players have received extensions or signed free agent deals?
And newsflash, "lock him up this offseason" requires more money aka a bag.
Dude you are an irrational fan. Your claim to the Wilpons being cheap is not signing Kimbrel or Keuchel who were both subpar and not extending Stroman when no one has gotten any type of deal this off season since the off season hasn't started yet. lol