im all for it but the votes arent there, on either side of the senateThey should get rid of it.
dems just have to win more seats
im all for it but the votes arent there, on either side of the senateThey should get rid of it.
the under-discussed aspect of the filibuster argument
i dont think HL would like what president deathsantis, chief justice roberts, leader mcconnell, and speaker mccarthy do without a filibuster in 2025
As I have been saying this is not a serious party and it's full of the weakest people in American politics
A party that constantly gets walked all over by the opposition and never plays offence, only the occasional weak defence
Yeah, I've said for years now that, aside from being incompetent at dealing with the media, this is the Dems worst problem.
They NEVER go on offense about anything, all they do is respond to Republican talking points. Which is a losing fight by design.
As I have been saying this is not a serious party and it's full of the weakest people in American politics
A party that constantly gets walked all over by the opposition and never plays offence, only the occasional weak defence
because trump told them to get rid of it in 2017, and they didntWhat makes you think they won't just get rid of the filibuster if it suits them?
biden/kamala is not winning in 2024. i dont even think he beats trump anymore tbh; not only is it laughable to make biden the most powerful man on earth until 2028, theres just too many negatives associated with his name. and most of its not even his fault, but thats the game. he wanted the jobJoe Biden reportedly told Barack Obama he's running in 2024
its the new york post...a sensational news outlet...
This was a good article...a few of the standouts and my thoughts:Relevant article by economist Noah Smith on the issues within the far left @Pressure
Alot of what he points out is prevalent on this forum
The American socialist worldview is just totally broken
At the center of the new American socialist worldview was a “theory of change”. It was almost impossible not to talk to socialists between 2016 and 2020 and not hear this phrase. In purely electoral terms, the socialist “theory of change” seemed to be that Bernie Sanders held a unique ability to unite traditional progressive constituencies with White working class voters of the kind who switched from Obama to Trump, all while energizing the youth to come out and vote.
But Bernie was simply unable to do this. In 2020 he lost the White working class voters who had flirted with him in 2016, while never really managing to connect with the Black voters who form the core of the Democratic primary electorate. Nor did the youth come out to vote. When most primary voters coalesced around Joe Biden on Super Tuesday and afterwards, Bernie supporters tried to craft a narrative that they had been stabbed in the back by an establishment conspiracy, instead of simply being rejected by the voters. The narrative did not take.
This was a good article...a few of the standouts and my thoughts:
The Ibrahim Al-Assil thread perfectly sums up several frequent HL posters who default to blame America.
The conversation in the Obama thread
I personally haven't seen many progressives tout degrowth but he did state this concept was more popular in EU than in the US.
His critique of Left-NIMBYism makes me think about the thread here on the topic several months ago.
I am personally one of the progressives who he says bought into the MMT cult. I still feel MMT has some qualities that aren't purely pseudo-economics.
The filibuster benefits conservatives WAY more than it benefits liberals.What makes you think they won't just get rid of the filibuster if it suits them?