i think I read somewhere that the DC movie universe is seperate from the TV universeWhat is the point of this? I don't get it. Somebody break down why DC would do this. Because at face value it seems retarded.
Fred.
Geoff Johns goes on to tell Buzzfeed that DC has no desire to just recreate what Marvel has already been doing for several years. Instead, the company wants to forge its own path and do something a little different. Setting up multiple universes that exist separately in one multiverse is a little complicated, but if the company pulls it off, it’s definitely a different, interesting route. So there you have it, kids. DC’s rolling with a multiverse, contrary to what you may have heard.
"You'll see a lot of DC universe characters [on The Flash and Arrow]. You won't see Batman or Superman. We're on production on Batman V Superman now. So you'll see characters like The Atom or Firestorm, but no not Batman or Superman right now [on TV]."
While I am a fan of Arrow and I am looking forward to The Flash, I do understand why DC Comics is keeping things separate. Zack Snyder, David Goyer and the folks behind Man of Steel and Batman v Superman are in the process of creating a huge cinematic universe, and I imagine that navigating around already established continuity outside their own vision isn't in their interest. As Johns explained,
"It's a separate universe than film so that the filmmakers can tell the story that's best for film, while we explore something different in a different corner of the DC universe. We will not be integrating the film and television universes."
If you added Flash from CW you would have to add Arrow
I'm asking why is it a separate entity? What's the point if you own the characters, and are clearly trying to build a connected universe?
Marvel ain't putting X-Men in "Infinity Wars" because they don't have the rights. If DC is putting Flash and whoever else in the movies....they clearly own the rights. So why not use what they already established? It would be like if Jessica Jones or Daredevil is in a MCU movie and they recast the part. Makes zero sense.
Fred.
you motherfukker are so see throughThat's a story reason to not connect them. I guess I'm asking, for a company that is behind Marvel in terms of building their universe....why throw out established characters and fan bases? What was the logic behind it?
Fred.
you motherfukker are so see through
Breh ya would be the same motherfukker talking bout D.C. copying Marvel, ya'll ain't slick.
Who in their right mind would argue that DC....who is starting their connected universe next month....isn't behind Marvel, who started their connected universe 8 years ago?
You dudes read facts and take it as picking a side. DC is trying to do what Marvel did, but a shortened version. Using the TV characters and arcs would've helped them achieve that.
I see people saying "but the shows aren't that good" or "the actors wouldn't translate well to the big screen"....which again, is due to them not planning this out.
Fred.
Breh ya would be the same motherfukker talking bout D.C. copying Marvel, ya'll ain't slick.
Lowkey, Ezra Miller is a decent actor. We Need To Talk About Kevin is some disturbing shyt. . I agree GG kills it as the Flash and tbh, I can't even picture EM as Barry Allen. Really?
Are u saying that DC isn't behind Marvel in terms of building their universe? I don't see how pointing that out makes someone a stanyou motherfukker are so see through