The championship is meaningless unless Brock Lesnar is holding it

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,274
Reputation
8,850
Daps
169,742
i think the belts have way more credibility than they had during the Cena era. that cartoon ass spinner belt was a disgrace and Cena having a lock on it was a joke.

And before that, the HHH dominating everything era was contrived.
 

Mook

We should all strive to be like Mr. Rogers.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
22,942
Reputation
2,478
Daps
58,628
Reppin
Raleigh
The belt actually did mean more when brock only wrestled 4 times. It was fire, u were gonna watch every match.

He shouldn't have lost for 2 years though and they should have built up 5 people at the same time in those 2 years. Whichever one was more over by like year one and 8 months left would get the brock match and build up.

instant star to whoever beats brock.
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-50
Daps
29,219
Reppin
NYC
It just depends on who's holding the belts. The title on Dean is meaningless. The same belt on AJ will mean something. It's that simple.
AJ is a made guy right now because he beat Cena.

He might be the ONLY guy right now who could hold down the belt and make it actually mean something. Not saying he's good enough to be a long term champion, but at this second he's the most credible guy they have.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
73,308
Reputation
5,789
Daps
174,666
Brock being a dominating champion created Roman Reigns as contender at Wrestlemania 31

Finally a traditional main event and it shockingly delivered
tumblr_nltydtBiOr1qkm056o1_500.jpg


Roman became a mainstay in the "main event" after brawling with the beast
:blessed:
 

jackswstd

Retired
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
72,976
Reputation
8,927
Daps
265,111
Reppin
Chicago
all the more reason why he should be the one holding it.

he's the only one capable of putting over the next big star.
And who will that be exactly? It was supposed to be Roman but they got scared, Rollins wasn't good enough, Punk wasn't good enough, neither was Dean or Randy. Everyone else currently on the roster be it on Raw, Smackdown or NXT won't be "believable". I guess that leaves Triple H
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-50
Daps
29,219
Reppin
NYC
And who will that be exactly? It was supposed to be Roman but they got scared, Rollins wasn't good enough, Punk wasn't good enough, neither was Dean or Randy. Everyone else currently on the roster be it on Raw, Smackdown or NXT won't be "believable". I guess that leaves Triple H
Roman was never going to be the next big star no matter how hard they pushed him.

Honestly I have no idea who could potentially go over Brock, but if you even have to ask that...implying that no one is legitimately good enough or big time enough... then that makes Brock's case for being the champ even stronger.
 
Top