The Boston Celtics have suspended head coach Ime Udoka for the entire 2022-23 season.

jdubnyce

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,216
Reputation
13,719
Daps
251,581
Reppin
t-dot till they bury me
We don’t know anything other than the fact that she was a “subordinate”.

Supposedly folks are saying he had an affair with female staff member Kathleen Nimmo-Lynch, who is the team’s Vice President of Finance & Controller Patrick Lynch

:heh: damn

Yikes...these people?
f509ea95-9011-4640-ba22-b740c9b3fd72.webp
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Messages
596
Reputation
204
Daps
2,486
Watching the full clip tho, it seems like Malika Andrews was coming at Stephen A for some shyt irrelevant to what he said though - projecting her anger at other folks onto him. If anything, they both agree that it was wrong for the women to get their names dragged through the mud, SAS is just blaming it on how the Celtics organization has handled things.

She was upset because right before she came on, SA was asking why if it was a consentual relationship, that the other party wasn't being named or having anything done to her, and all the other women in the org were bearing the brunt of it. I think that set Malika off because IF it is a sexual harassment claim, then of course the woman should not be named. This is why she was talking about knowing all the facts i.e. is this consentual. But she was heavy handed with it and talked AT SA rather than to him in a discussion. The key point is the Celtics vagueness versus the leaked reports opens this up to interpretation.
 

FunkDoc1112

Heavily Armed
Joined
Sep 14, 2013
Messages
19,689
Reputation
6,018
Daps
102,905
Reppin
The 718
She was upset because right before she came on, SA was asking why if it was a consentual relationship, that the other party wasn't being named or having anything done to her, and all the other women in the org were bearing the brunt of it. I think that set Malika off because IF it is a sexual harassment claim, then of course the woman should not be named. This is why she was talking about knowing all the facts i.e. is this consentual. But she was heavy handed with it and talked AT SA rather than to him in a discussion. The key point is the Celtics vagueness versus the leaked reports opens this up to interpretation.
Gotcha, and yeah I just peeped that part a couple minutes ago too.
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,153
Reputation
2,826
Daps
156,242
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
Honestly, the scenario you are talking about ain't as bad as the insiders are making it seem. Cheating and a lovers quarrel? Nah it's more to it then that and I'd bet money on it.
Anytime sexual harassment is reported, all bets are off. Which is why it took over 2 months of them investigating it.
 

iamduval

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
23,624
Reputation
1,373
Daps
58,283
Reppin
NULL
She was upset because right before she came on, SA was asking why if it was a consentual relationship, that the other party wasn't being named or having anything done to her, and all the other women in the org were bearing the brunt of it. I think that set Malika off because IF it is a sexual harassment claim, then of course the woman should not be named. This is why she was talking about knowing all the facts i.e. is this consentual. But she was heavy handed with it and talked AT SA rather than to him in a discussion. The key point is the Celtics vagueness versus the leaked reports opens this up to interpretation.


Yeah I rewatched it a couple of times. SAS didn’t say that she needed to be named. He’s basically saying if he did more than what the Celtics organization leaked to Sham then why hasn’t he been terminated (which has been asked a few times in this thread)


I think SAS is just pointing out how it’s unfair for Umeh to get his name sullied which may prevent him from immediately getting another job. However that is a slippery hill to stand on when considering that he may have done some egregious shyt.

Malika completely jumped out the window with her triggered nonsense.
 

jaydawg08

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
9,124
Reputation
1,115
Daps
22,274
She was upset because right before she came on, SA was asking why if it was a consentual relationship, that the other party wasn't being named or having anything done to her, and all the other women in the org were bearing the brunt of it. I think that set Malika off because IF it is a sexual harassment claim, then of course the woman should not be named. This is why she was talking about knowing all the facts i.e. is this consentual. But she was heavy handed with it and talked AT SA rather than to him in a discussion. The key point is the Celtics vagueness versus the leaked reports opens this up to interpretation.
Malika handled that wrong, and I'm not surprised in the slightest that a women can't speak rationally on a topic like this.. I'm far from a women hater or basher, but sometimes there's certain topics you just can't have with someone like Malika or Molly.
 

jdubnyce

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,216
Reputation
13,719
Daps
251,581
Reppin
t-dot till they bury me
Malika handled that wrong, and I'm not surprised in the slightest that a women can't speak rationally on a topic like this.. I'm far from a women hater or basher, but sometimes there's certain topics you just can't have with someone like Malika or Molly.
She had way too much emotion to think logically
 
Top