His slippery slope logic is scary. What if they were 12 or 11.
Why do yall constantly slide the ages down from what's being discussed?
His slippery slope logic is scary. What if they were 12 or 11.
His slippery slope logic is scary. What if they were 12 or 11.
You feel comfortable fukking 16yr olds? And that's legal.
If you think all women are whores it makes sense. Women know whats up even when they are kids. So I guess in his mind 12yr olds can seduce grown ass men.
I'm pretty comfortable fukking whatever is legal in my area
I understand the fake moral outrage sounds dumb to you in your head for the ages being discussed, that's why you move the number down. It is what it is tho
You may want to think about this statement again.
14 is shocking enough to be nikka.
Because it’s wrong?Idk why women need to lie to validate their points it just goes to show how flimsy it is in the first place . I been saying 14 year olds shouldn't be fukking anyone but it is was it is. 14 year olds fukk each other every day, why does them fukking an adult make a difference?
What I need for you to do is explain to me why it is better for a 14 year old to fukk another 14 year old over a 25 year old.
Ima need you to break that science down because there seems to be an extreme lack of logic coming from the R. Kelly haters.
Because it’s wrong?
The power balance between a teen and an adult is tipped primarily to the adult in that situation that’s why no p*ssy getting nikkas like you advocate for other men to get with you get women to groom them. Remember when you said this?
From this thread btw and even then some of your worst posts had to get deleted . Why you still need this explained is beyond me
Why do you guys think R Kelly’s career withstood his pedo allegations??
That’s the whole reason why minors ain’t legally able to “consent”. They supposed to be stupid.I mean shyt, it's a lot of shyt that's problematic to me, 15 year olds fukking each other in the first place is just as bad to me but it is what it is. nikka not snatching these chicks off the streets, they know who he is, what he's about and they're still consenting to every one of his requests.
I ain't justifying shyt and don't really care. My initial post was just pointing out the inconsistent outrage that people have. Ban R Kelly but we listening to nikkas who glorify shyt just as bad. That was my initial point.So being mature at 16, makes it ok for a 40 yr old to be fukking on her? You would sleep with a mature 10yr old? Where is the line drawn. You keep saying it’s just your opinion, but no matter how you try to spin it, you’re basically trying to justify pedophila with your “opinion”
Do you tho
I'm finna load up a best of R Kelly playlist to piss off these hoes (pun intended)
fuk #metoo
fuk cacs
fuk mayonaise
fuk wonder bread
fuk Seinfeld
fuk billy idol
free Bill Cosby
No it doesn't its a whole new era now. Aint no way in hell Black or White you taking a 15yr old Bride wouldn't be looked at with scorn. Plus R Kelly was a mega star, dude doing joints with White Royalty. NOW C Delores Tucker might have had a chance against Pac. You wilding if you thing times are anywhere near similar.
That’s the whole reason why minors ain’t legally able to “consent”. They supposed to be stupid.
Any nikka with a little noteriety or money can take advantage of that. He supposed to try that shyt with Adults