1/8
@svpino
No, Large Language Models didn't achieve the Kaggle Grandmaster level.
It's unfortunate researchers have to resort to clickbait and misleading titles to get people to read their papers.
Read the paper, and you'll see what's going on.
1. Many of the competitions they used aren't even real competitions.
2. The system uses many manual, hardcoded steps by the authors to help guide the model.
3. The system is limited to only certain types of problems that fit the hardcoded guardrails.
There are good ideas in the paper, but unfortunately, most people will dismiss them because of the misleading title.
2/8
@gpt_biz
This paper offers some intriguing ideas and advancements, but the title may have oversold its achievements—worth a read if you're curious about the nuances behind the headlines.
3/8
@korutx
Plenty of AI papers out there with clickbait titles, guess it's the Attention is All You Need effect
4/8
@WalterReade
I say we put the Agents in a room full of Kaggle Grandmasters and see who comes out on top.
5/8
@victor_explore
it might get attention but we all know what's under the hood
6/8
@kevin_ai_gamer
I'm so tired of seeing misleading titles like this. It's just a way to get clicks and attention.
7/8
@segundafundacao
It's all about marketing these days.
8/8
@engmlubbad
It is indeed concerning how the narrative around AI capabilities sometimes leans towards sensationalism rather than substantiated achievements.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
@svpino
No, Large Language Models didn't achieve the Kaggle Grandmaster level.
It's unfortunate researchers have to resort to clickbait and misleading titles to get people to read their papers.
Read the paper, and you'll see what's going on.
1. Many of the competitions they used aren't even real competitions.
2. The system uses many manual, hardcoded steps by the authors to help guide the model.
3. The system is limited to only certain types of problems that fit the hardcoded guardrails.
There are good ideas in the paper, but unfortunately, most people will dismiss them because of the misleading title.
2/8
@gpt_biz
This paper offers some intriguing ideas and advancements, but the title may have oversold its achievements—worth a read if you're curious about the nuances behind the headlines.
3/8
@korutx
Plenty of AI papers out there with clickbait titles, guess it's the Attention is All You Need effect
4/8
@WalterReade
I say we put the Agents in a room full of Kaggle Grandmasters and see who comes out on top.
5/8
@victor_explore
it might get attention but we all know what's under the hood
6/8
@kevin_ai_gamer
I'm so tired of seeing misleading titles like this. It's just a way to get clicks and attention.
7/8
@segundafundacao
It's all about marketing these days.
8/8
@engmlubbad
It is indeed concerning how the narrative around AI capabilities sometimes leans towards sensationalism rather than substantiated achievements.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196