Tariq Nasheed vs Andrew Schulz on The Brilliant Idiots...VIDEO ADDED

[LinusCaldwell]

If y'all like podcasts check out mine... www.fteswl.com it's on iTunes too please subscribe and SoundCloud

 

[AJaRuleStan]

He answer the question by giving equal treatment to blacks as whites get. It's that simple

I just want to add detail to this real quick because there was more to his explanation than expressed in your post, and imo, it gets at the foundation of Tariq's world view.

First, he said equal treatment and resources but that alone doesn't clarify his outlook in full. If you listen to his explanation that follows regarding wealth/budget disparities between black/white neighborhoods and white/black public schools, what he is really demanding to be found in society for him to conclude a system of WS is not true is an absence of noticeable disparities between groups.

 

[No Sleep]

I just want to add detail to this real quick because there was more to his explanation than expressed in your post, and imo, it gets at the foundation of Tariq's world view.

First, he said equal treatment and resources but that alone doesn't clarify his outlook in full. If you listen to his explanation that follows regarding wealth/budget disparities between black/white neighborhoods and white/black public schools, what he is really demanding to be found in society for him to conclude a system of WS is not true is an absence of noticeable disparities between groups.

Call Up

 

[Enzo]

Just finished listening to this whole podcast.

Schultz was definitely out of his league. He would bring up a topic, then when TN came with a response, he would deflect, interrupt or change topic. Then minutes later claim he won the argument. Terrible.
Respect to TN for being so calm, cool and collected during this whole ordeal, I can't say I would have been able to resist going at old boy's head.

 

[Unknown Poster]

When in the History of the United States has a black officer got away with,killing a white man. Serious question

Never.

 

[Real]

White boy is condescending as fukk.

 

[Paradise50]

I've listened to this debate a LOT (was working and driving a lot yesterday) and here's my take on it.

First off.. Schulz came prepared, tariq didn't. Let that sink in.

Tariq did NO RESEARCH of any current stats so he couldn't counter any statistical data. He literally walked into the boxing gym off the streets, hopped his ass in the ring, and started scrappin with a nikka that's been training for weeks and was already warmed up... AND HE STILL WON.

This is interesting because I don't think they even had a topic of debate. Was it even supposed to be a debate? Other than tariq asking them to explain their opinion on the tucker carlsen debates, i saw no reason for them to be debating. Seems like Schulz just was practicing WS by springing debates on an unprepared opponent.

The good: Tariq won as usual. Debating SWS about whether or not WS exists is a free win every time. To be honest, it's so free that that particular debate is a waste of time for black folks at this point. I enjoy it because i get to learn about debating WS/SWS counter points but proving WS exists is easier than proving gravity exists (seriously).

The Bad: I think Tariq needs to tighten up on the semantics. He was giving schulz too much ammo to filibuster and waste time. Tighten up on stats too. The current WS/SWS have all kinds of stats to try to disprove WS, along with the usual fallacious arguments. Tariq's debate style is too OG. In the Khalid vs Hannity era you could simply hit the SWS with obvious proofs of hypocrisy, a few zingers, and a MACRO view of the issues and they'd be done. But now in the Molyneux, Shapiro, and Milo era you're gonna need a few more weapons. Those weapons are data sets and stats. I also think tariq dropped the ball heavily on the Nigerian argument.

The Ugly: Schulz is a fukkIN LIGHTWEIGHT Are you nikkas serious? I've been hearing about this clown on here for like a year. A few of you c00ns hyping this lame up. He's a LIGHTWEIGHT. I've never seen anybody try to win whole arguments with attacks on semantics, personal insults, and fallacies. It was like a fox news hit piece... that lasted an hour. I mean what's the difference between him, tucker, and hannity? Serious question.

He got destroyed on most points and STILL wouldn't concede. That's suspicious behavior. If we're debating something that's deadly serious like WS, and you'd rather debate about semantics instead of correcting my error and then conceding, you care more about trying to win a debate rather than fix a problem.

I 100% suspect him of being a WS.

debating w/ stats is a WS tactic to try to deflect.

So many different variables behind stats that it makes it very subjective. That's why White supremacist always run to stats....it's a tool for deflection

So basically you typed multiple paragraphs proving you don't have a grasp of statistics, and how they can be used to create false narratives

But I've seen you pull other shyt out ya ass to try and disparage Tariq's name.

 

[desjardins]

Honestly this debate was ass
I came away thinking both these dudes have serious flaws in their arguments and I wasn't convinced by either of them
I hate to say it but you can tell Tariq doesn't have a background in academia
Listening to him debate is like listening to one of my friends debate, I mostly agree with Him but it's too easy to back him into corners and slip him up with facts
Tariq rarely comes with specifics, compare him to Noam Chomsky or Cornell West
Those dudes make arguments with dates/specifics, introduce proper context, and position their arguments against logical fallacies
Tariq kept talking about Schulz manipulating statistics, like dude you made 4 documentaries on this subject how can't you endlessly rattle off correct statistics and set the context such that it's irrefutable

 

[MostReal]

Shultz was debunking every instance of TN claiming something was being simply moved by agents of Anglo Sup... TN was spewing stuff without concrete evidence.

 

[MostReal]

Just finished listening to this whole podcast.

Schultz was definitely out of his league. He would bring up a topic, then when TN came with a response, he would deflect, interrupt or change topic. Then minutes later claim he won the argument. Terrible.
Respect to TN for being so calm, cool and collected during this whole ordeal, I can't say I would have been able to resist going at old boy's head.

It was a Tariq highlight reel. It was that lopsided

 

[Mowgli]

Shultz was debunking every instance of TN claiming something was being simply moved by agents of Anglo Sup... TN was spewing stuff without concrete evidence.

Oreo

 

[Roid Jones]

Do y'all think Tariq could get the best of Stefan Molyneux

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

Shultz was debunking every instance of TN claiming something was being simply moved by agents of Anglo Sup... TN was spewing stuff without concrete evidence.

People feel tight about this comment but it is true. I know what time it is but you can't come to anyone that's purposely going to deflect with simply "ya know." Need something more concrete.

TN: The anglo supremacists let blacks from other places come and prosper.

My (or any somewhat smart person) first response is "how and/or why?"

TN: You know how and why.

Me: No I don't. Explain it to me.

TN: c'mon, man. You know. The WS power structure.

Me: Elaborate on the WS power structure, please.

TN: Read XXX book and it's right there.

Me: So, I assume you read and analyzed this text so why not just quote or paraphrase it for me? You brought it up so educate me right now, please.

TN: See this is what c00ns and anglos do. That's that "Im anglo/c00n so I say so."

That was TN for the first hour. That's not debating let alone winning. I like listening to him but he just talks. He's not an academic.

 

[MostReal]

The reason it's important to debate and debunk WS talking points is because black people tend to believe the rhetoric.

Tariq is doing a great work every time he sons these Talking points.

These talks disarm the WS by unpeeling the layers of lies

 

[Maschine_Man]

People feel tight about this comment but it is true. I know what time it is but you can't come to anyone that's purposely going to deflect with simply "ya know." Need something more concrete.

TN: The anglo supremacists let blacks from other places come and prosper.

My (or any somewhat smart person) first response is "how and/or why?"

TN: You know how and why.

Me: No I don't. Explain it to me.

TN: c'mon, man. You know. The WS power structure.

Me: Elaborate on the WS power structure, please.

TN: Read XXX book and it's right there.

Me: So, I assume you read and analyzed this text so why not just quote or paraphrase it for me? You brought it up so educate me right now, please.

TN: See this is what c00ns and anglos do. That's that "Im anglo/c00n so I say so."

That was TN for the first hour. That's not debating let alone winning. I like listening to him but he just talks. He's not an academic.

What I don't understand is ppl that actually took the time to listen to this and still come away saying he "bodied" him or some other lame shyt.


just displaying their ignorance and confirmation bias.



but the worst part of all of this, is that Tariq Nasheed is an agent of White Supremacy. He is doing more damage(and not TO WS) and ppl are just eating it up.....