Tariq Nasheed vs Andrew Schulz on The Brilliant Idiots...VIDEO ADDED

[Ronnie Lott]

Shultz was debunking every instance of TN claiming something was being simply moved by agents of Anglo Sup... TN was spewing stuff without concrete evidence.

 

[keond]

I keep seeing someone say "Shulz was getting the better of Tariq early on in the debate". Where? No one can seem to point this out. Please can anyone explain specifically where in this debate where Shulz was even remotely winning?

The lies Shultz was saying was insane

All I kept hearing was him interrupting Tariq using straw man arguments while making dikk and rape analogies

 

[macadomusic]

I completely agree...

If a black officers kills a white man and gets away with it, he's a "sacrifice."

When in the History of the United States has a black officer got away with,killing a white man. Serious question

 

[KodeBlue]

When in the History of the United States has a black officer got away with,killing a white man. Serious question

A few months ago

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nyda...trooper-led-officer-100-mph-article-1.2772165

 

[Gravity]

I found it funny that when Tariq said that the original Celts were black, and cited a white man for that information, but when Shultz said something while citing a black man, Tariq dismissed it immediately.

Tariq got caught up in that "he's white and he said so" shyt.

Well the black man that Shultz was citing was clearly full of shyt and his assertions have already been debunked.

A few months ago

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nyda...trooper-led-officer-100-mph-article-1.2772165

This man led a state trooper on high speed chase that reached over 100 mph. The trooper even attempted to ram his car first in an attempt to to stop him. In this instance his car was a weapon so he wasn't unarmed. Nice try tho.

 

[DamienWayne]

shutlz would get destroyed by zo williams or anyone with some historical contextual knowledge. tariq is clever but hes not an academic

 

[Fatboi1]

The Coli right?

I bet 70% of the fukkers on here probably look like Andrew Schultz.

 

[KodeBlue]

Well the black man that Shultz was citing was clearly full of shyt and his assertions have already been debunked.
This man led a state trooper on high speed chase that reached over 100 mph. The trooper even attempted to ram his car first in an attempt to to stop him. In this instance his car was a weapon so he wasn't unarmed. Nice try tho.

1. Has it been proven that blacks were the first Celtic inhabitants of Ireland? Was the white man that Tariq Nasheed cited full of shyt as well?

2. His car is a weapon since he was trying to not have his car rammed by the officer's car.... That made absolutely no sense.

I'll concede... I don't even feel like breaking any and all of your arguments down while still ,very minutely, agreeing with you. I will say this tho, if you debate anything like Tariq Nasheed, you'll get cooked.

 

[Gravity]

1. Has it been proven that blacks were the first Celtic inhabitants of Ireland?

Have you even done the slightest bit of research on the subject to find out for yourself?

2. His car is a weapon since he was trying to not have his car rammed by the officer's car.... That made absolutely no sense.

No, his car was a weapon because he was recklessly driving it at speeds that reached 100 mph in open traffic putting everybody out on the road at the time at risk.

I'll concede... I don't even feel like breaking any and all of your arguments down while still ,very minutely, agreeing with you. I will say this tho, if you debate anything like Tariq Nasheed, you'll get cooked.

No, I don't debate like Nasheed but I don't really have a problem with how debates. Nobody's perfect and it's easy to critique in hindsight.

I'll challenge you like I've challenged everyone else who pretends as if Shultz scored points during this exchange. Name one valid point that he made.

shutlz would get destroyed by zo williams or anyone with some historical contextual knowledge. tariq is clever but hes not an academic

Facts don't matter to whites like Shultz. It's shame on you for not being able to see that.

 

[Treblemaka]

i went to white schools my whole life and am well spoken... the last time a crakkka came at me on some halfway racist shyt i cracked his fukking jaw in front of half the school. Same thing goes for today i will chin check a crakkka esp one like schulz.

nikkas always tryna reason with these crakkkas. They don't give a fukk about your intelligence if you're telling them about their savage nature and their plague like effect on the earth.

fukk getting a cac to understand. You TELL them what it is. Youre from the caves. You're people are nothing but liars and murderers. The sun hates you. The world hates you.You committ the most genocide. You steal all the resources. you cut down all the trees. You pollute the air and waters. You blaspheme the most high. You use the police as a weapon to oppress blacks. You poison our food supply and then hit us with toxic pharmakeia to finish us off. You're homosexual fakkits. Your people fukk dogs and eat abominations like pork, shrimp, crab, squirrel, racooon, snail etc. You're cross dressers and degenerates. You're the biggest criminals to ever breathe on earth.

If god is just, judgment is coming for this wicked race

Do That Ish in the corporate world and see if it doesn't get you a personal damages lawsuit, a felony assault charge (which means you're never coming back to corporate) and you may do jail time.

All because of something he SAID to you.


Move better breh.

 

[Rigby.]

shutlz would get destroyed by zo williams or anyone with some historical contextual knowledge. tariq is clever but hes not an academic

I will definitely say that thus far in my listening to this, Tariq is laying down some strong points, but the foundation behind them are varying degrees in strength. Like you said, if dude was a duo act with another guy who's like a history book or some shyt, they'd shut shyt down (2 on 1 wouldnt be fun though)

 

[Rigby.]

This reminds me of what the Trevor Noah situation could be in reverse.

If like Tomi Lahren threw some shyt together against Noah on her show with the advantage of topics, lost her footing on said topics, and started throwing darts as fast as possible

 

[KodeBlue]

Have you even done the slightest bit of research on the subject to find out for yourself?

No, his car was a weapon because he was recklessly driving it at speeds that reached 100 mph in open traffic putting everybody out on the road at the time at risk.

No, I don't debate like Nasheed but I don't really have a problem with how debates. Nobody's perfect and it's easy to critique in hindsight.

I'll challenge you like I've challenged everyone else who pretends as if Shultz scored points during this exchange. Name one valid point that he made.

See, you're answering a question with a question. I'm not letting you get away with that. I'll ask again: Has it been proven that blacks were the first Celtic inhabitants of Ireland? Was the white man that Tariq Nasheed cited full of shyt as well?

2. Let's say your argument is valid, now did the officer shoot the man while he was driving? Nope! So, you lose that argument.

3. One thing I can think of off the top of my head is that Tariq said anyone who is black and successful is a token, and Nigerians are only successful because the Omni-present white supremacy let's then. I wanted to know, at what percentage are successful blacks no longer tokens? And what would a Nigerian outside of the reasons listed for deportation be deported for??

Edit: you won. You don't have to answer, just showing you something here....

 

[Crayola Coyote]

schultz' tactic when he's being proven wrong is just to start laughing and saying the other person doesnt know what they're talking and switch the topic or pull out strawmen

Haven't watched the debate but I can tell this Schultz dude voice is annoying as fukk

 

[Crayola Coyote]

Early on in the argument Tariq said black immigrants are allowed to have wealth and black Americans are not.
I didn't get that at all.

I think it's to do a "divided and conquer" to allow one group have something and one has not so you can swoop in and dominate the situation