You really can't reason with c00ns/crackers because they see/hear what they want to see/hear. That's the only lesson from that "debate" and this thread.andrew had him....
and nearly buried him... but then Charlemagne walked through the door
You really can't reason with c00ns/crackers because they see/hear what they want to see/hear. That's the only lesson from that "debate" and this thread.andrew had him....
and nearly buried him... but then Charlemagne walked through the door
This is exactly what happened.andrew had him....
and nearly buried him... but then Charlemagne walked through the door
I found the cac.Not exactly. They were talking over each other's points. Tariq's point was that black people are powerless in any position and Schultz showed that Baltimore had black police departments, mayors, etc. They started missing each other because I don't think either of them know Baltimore.
LMAO dude was bodying Tariq off the jump. As the debate went on Schulz lost steam because Tariq is a slick talker who doesn't need facts or exact numbers. So the length of the debate favors his style.
Schulz lost the Obama debate badly because Obama never specifically signed policy for blacks. He exclusively used the "rising all boats" strategy in policy. Easy work for Tariq.
Before Charlamagne walked in Schulz won. Afterwards Tariq won because the conversation basically turned into arguing over the semantics of the words Tariq uses.so who really won?
everybody is saying something different
@ℒee don't forget, Schulz was an undergrad psychology major...so he thinks his sophomoric approach to arguments and "knowing people" makes him more eloquent.
Tariq flat out called him out at the end with Schulz trying to baffle the opponent with bullshyt and filibustering.
Why can't I have my own opinion? This is why progressive blacks generally stay the fukk away from black people at large....I found the cac.![]()
You're not progressive though. You're flat out lying about a debate.Why can't I have my own opinion? This is why progressive blacks generally stay the fukk away from black people at large....
But dude was saying if the kids in Chi weren't poor, they wouldn't be shooting at each other. That's one of the most naive things I've ever hear. Both these clowns go on to say people own guns outta fear for their lifeGun violence does have a positive relationship with poverty. Guns are a symbol of power.
Honestly, I won't even waste effort on debating Schulz unless I can go for a full hour, because he's laden with so much shyt that it takes time for you to settle in before you start bodying people.It's clear to me Schultz just doesn't want to lose. He loves to play with semantics when it's convenient for him.
THIS is the type of shyt we're dealing with,..
Before I'd ever debate someone like him, I'd need to know if he's open to listening or is he just trying to win for some social media clout.
And Tariq couldn't answer what level of representation would be acceptable to 12% of the population?Couldn't answer his own rhetoric about whites being 5:1 and why the fact that there are more blacks locked up in prison than whites.
because its a bullshyt taking point.And Tariq couldn't answer what level of representation would be acceptable to 12% of the population?
Heres the thing, African immigrants are the MOST educated of any legal immigrants. Period. And its not even close.I thought Tariq won this debate narrowly this is the probably one of the most competitive debate I've seen him in though..... I agree with Schulz about the Nigerian African immigrant thing I had heard they have some of the highest education achievement but they still aren't making the jobs so he was wrong about that point. Schilz was also completely quiet on the reason why most black men are in prison for non violent drug offences despite only making 12-13% of the population