Tariq Nasheed vs Andrew Schulz on The Brilliant Idiots...VIDEO ADDED

Big Boda

My Family Are Not Immigrants.
Joined
Aug 18, 2014
Messages
6,444
Reputation
1,990
Daps
37,298
Reppin
400 Year Survivors Of American Slavery.
thread went from schulz is bodying him tariq is a horrible debator:damn: to tariq is killing him:whew:

Exactly and Schulz is exposing himself worse than Tucker Carlson when it comes to deflecting and over talking to cut off being ethered by facts.

I'm glad I posted late in this thread so i can capture c00n mfs in my ignore list like pokemon after they claim shulz won with all the bull he's doing in this debate.
 

O.Red

Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
18,003
Reputation
5,507
Daps
71,826
Reppin
NULL
Andrew doesn't seem to believe anything with out quantifiable proof... He doesn't use common sense it seems. To the point where he comes off intellectually dishonest.

He doesn't deal with hypothetical and he's not able to transpose one idea on another concept for optimal understanding.

If it's not written, he's not gonna believe it.

That's just debate 101, that's what you're supposed to do, however, that leaves a chasm between him and true understanding.


These discussions shouldn't be debates because no body wants to lose, so they won't listen to understand.
This

The ending by Shultz :dead:

TN: "What you said was completely full of shyt..." No disrespect :mjgrin:

:dead:
 

KingDanz

Veteran
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
15,065
Reputation
4,708
Daps
73,948
Reppin
NULL
I think it happened during the rise of Trump because all these alt-right dudes started coming alive once these online communities were talking about "SJWs" and "being too PC" and what not.

@Sagat @Trajan...schulz is another victim to white male radicalization.
the terms SJW, Race Baiter, Cuck are plastered all over the internet when the topic of race is discussed.
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
37,870
Reputation
3,484
Daps
104,324
Andrew doesn't seem to believe anything with out quantifiable proof... He doesn't use common sense it seems. To the point where he comes off intellectually dishonest.

He doesn't deal with hypothetical and he's not able to transpose one idea on another concept for optimal understanding.

If it's not written, he's not gonna believe it.

That's just debate 101, that's what you're supposed to do, however, that leaves a chasm between him and true understanding.


These discussions shouldn't be debates because no body wants to lose, so they won't listen to understand.
Know your opponent. That's how anglos are. Sadly there were a lot of things left on the table for TN to touch on. For instance, gentrification. Banks wont give people loans (understandably) to people who are disenfranchised in impoverished neighborhoods to build it up but turn around and give loans to others to come in purchase the same property and land while in cahoots within appraisers to make low values of the homes so they don't have to lend as much. Other people gentrify the neighborhood and their other properties in the area values increases. It's deep with numbers to prove it. Laws and statistics are made vague for convenience and ambiguity.
 
Top