Tariq Nasheed vs Andrew Schulz on The Brilliant Idiots...VIDEO ADDED

Momentum

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
25,830
Reputation
856
Daps
60,086
Reppin
NULL
Dude said black police run the police union :russ:
Not exactly. They were talking over each other's points. Tariq's point was that black people are powerless in any position and Schultz showed that Baltimore had black police departments, mayors, etc. They started missing each other because I don't think either of them know Baltimore.
Schulz lost this one...badly...
LMAO dude was bodying Tariq off the jump. As the debate went on Schulz lost steam because Tariq is a slick talker who doesn't need facts or exact numbers. So the length of the debate favors his style.
at the end Schulz got BODIED.

Cause Tariq kept dropping straight fire and all Schulz could do was debate if stats were legit. Then Tariq would drop names then he'd claim he wants more stats.

Schulz really is full of shyt and relies on trying to find anecdotes. His favorite argument is "well not everyone" or "the stats say" or "can you prove that?"

HE DOESNT EVEN HOLD HIMSELF TO THAT STANDARD.
Schulz lost the Obama debate badly because Obama never specifically signed policy for blacks. He exclusively used the "rising all boats" strategy in policy. Easy work for Tariq.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
311,158
Reputation
-34,188
Daps
621,364
Reppin
The Deep State
Yo this white is trying to convince Charlec00n that gun violence exist because of poor people. Charlemagne dropped that c00n persona and you could tell a limit was crossed.
bruh, that gun shyt was pissing me off...cause they both had a point and Schulz was just playing dumb because he couldn't control the convo. I almost shut the show off there.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
311,158
Reputation
-34,188
Daps
621,364
Reppin
The Deep State
Andrew doesn't seem to believe anything with out quantifiable proof... He doesn't use common sense it seems. To the point where he comes off intellectually dishonest.

He doesn't deal with hypothetical and he's not able to transpose one idea on another concept for optimal understanding.

If it's not written, he's not gonna believe it.

That's just debate 101, that's what you're supposed to do, however, that leaves a chasm between him and true understanding.


These discussions shouldn't be debates because no body wants to lose, so they won't listen to understand.
I used to think this, except when Tariq was dropping specific names and numbers, Schultz was on that "well I need to see that" or "I haven't seen that" or just flat out denying any stat HE doesn't like

Look when Tariq was naming black people who got shot and Schulz just passed it off as "well you named 4 people..." shyt was so dismissive
 

JayGatsby

R.I.P CHINX
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
15,967
Reputation
2,121
Daps
55,602
Not exactly. They were talking over each other's points. Tariq's point was that black people are powerless in any position and Schultz showed that Baltimore had black police departments, mayors, etc. They started missing each other because I don't think either of them know Baltimore.

LMAO dude was bodying Tariq off the jump. As the debate went on Schulz lost steam because Tariq is a slick talker who doesn't need facts or exact numbers. So the length of the debate favors his style.

Schulz lost the Obama debate badly because Obama never specifically signed policy for blacks. He exclusively used the "rising all boats" strategy in policy. Easy work for Tariq.
andrew had him....:ehh:

and nearly buried him:picard:... but then Charlemagne walked through the door
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
311,158
Reputation
-34,188
Daps
621,364
Reppin
The Deep State
Exactly and Schulz is exposing himself worse than Tucker Carlson when it comes to deflecting and over talking to cut off being ethered by facts.

I'm glad I posted late in this thread so i can capture c00n mfs in my ignore list like pokemon after they claim shulz won with all the bull he's doing in this debate.
you gotta remember, if Tariq was:

1. in the studio with Tucker Carlson
2. Had more time

...he'd BURY anyone on Fox News. Even O'Reilly.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
311,158
Reputation
-34,188
Daps
621,364
Reppin
The Deep State
Know your opponent. That's how anglos are. Sadly there were a lot of things left on the table for TN to touch on. For instance, gentrification. Banks wont give people loans (understandably) to people who are disenfranchised in impoverished neighborhoods to build it up but turn around and give loans to others to come in purchase the same property and land while in cahoots within appraisers to make low values of the homes so they don't have to lend as much. Other people gentrify the neighborhood and their other properties in the area values increases. It's deep with numbers to prove it. Laws and statistics are made vague for convenience and ambiguity.
thats why theres gotta be a follow up to this.

Even a full 2 hour version.

Tariq buried him and given more time, Tariq would have flat out dragged dude
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
311,158
Reputation
-34,188
Daps
621,364
Reppin
The Deep State
Wow, this dude Schulz... He's getting fried. He's frustrated. All these compliment sandwiches he's throwing out "you're so smart, you're talented"
:camby:
thats basically the boxing clinch...just try to keep yourself close the opponent so he doesn't completely knock you out :wow:
 

NO-BadAzz

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
10,889
Reputation
1,881
Daps
32,106
Not exactly. They were talking over each other's points. Tariq's point was that black people are powerless in any position and Schultz showed that Baltimore had black police departments, mayors, etc. They started missing each other because I don't think either of them know Baltimore.

LMAO dude was bodying Tariq off the jump. As the debate went on Schulz lost steam because Tariq is a slick talker who doesn't need facts or exact numbers. So the length of the debate favors his style.

Schulz lost the Obama debate badly because Obama never specifically signed policy for blacks. He exclusively used the "rising all boats" strategy in policy. Easy work for Tariq.


Dude said black ppl run the police union there....Listen again my boy
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
311,158
Reputation
-34,188
Daps
621,364
Reppin
The Deep State
@ℒee don't forget, Schulz was an undergrad psychology major...so he thinks his sophomoric approach to arguments and "knowing people" makes him more eloquent.

Tariq flat out called him out at the end with Schulz trying to baffle the opponent with bullshyt and filibustering.
 
Top