I’m sure they ment “more powerful” than a barely a PS4.Discourse everywhere, including here. People said they just wanted a more powerful switch and for nintendo to avoid having another Wii U moment.
I’m sure they ment “more powerful” than a barely a PS4.Discourse everywhere, including here. People said they just wanted a more powerful switch and for nintendo to avoid having another Wii U moment.
Because it cost alot of money to develop those graphically intense games and what they're doing is working for them.I'm trying to figure out why Nintendo won't push the envelope on graphics/power and games that really display it....like a Mario but instead of looking like Disney, it looks like some Pixar shyt.
I’m sure they ment “more powerful” than a barely a PS4.
Power doesn’t matter when you have IPs
Leaks say its similar to the ps4 pro, which is a generational leap considering that the switch was barely more powerful than a ps3/360.I’m sure they ment “more powerful” than a barely a PS4.
I’m not trolling Nintendo has a great lineup that sells.You’re trolling but you’re right lol
Pokemon is gonna sell no matter how ugly it continues to look.
I agree, but you should have told that to the people with unrealistic expectations, not me.Then that’s unrealistic, because a handheld is just not going to jump two generations and still be affordable for most people, especially children.
Naw, according to DF PS pro ain’t happening.Leaks say it’s similar to the ps4 pro, which is a generational leap considering that the switch was barely more powerful than a ps3/360.
Digital foundry said the hardware was on the level of a ps4 with added processing technology for Nvidia. They said it should be able to play any last generation game with no issue, claiming it's slightly stronger that a ps3 is hyperbole.I agree, but you should have told that to the people with unrealistic expectations, not me.
Naw, according to DF PS pro ain’t happening.
Looks like we are gong from slightly stronger than a ps3 to MAYBE a ps4. definitely not strong enough for most modern AAA games or a transformational change in nintendo’s games.
It Will be a switch with better performance.
It’s all relative, but today merely being able to play PS4 games isn’t much write home about.Digital foundry said the hardware was on the level of a ps4 with added processing technology for Nvidia. They said it should be able to play any last generation game with no issue, claiming it's slightly stronger that a ps3 is hyperbole.
Nintendo is afraid to take a risk, i think the market will force them to at some point. They don’t have another console division to kill.
The switch could barely play ps4/x1 games in a severely diminished state. Some last gen games could only be played through the cloud on switch. It struggled to run ps3/360 games at times.It’s all relative, but today merely being able to play PS4 games isn’t much write home about.
Remember Switch COULD play ps4 games if devs thought the time in optimization was worth it.
I just don’t see very many devs going back into last gen games and working on switch 2 ports especially considering the Switch 2 will have a low install base for a while, and by the time Switch 2 does have a considerable install base, current gen games will be reaching toward next gen, not trying to reach back to the PS4.