Swaziland bans 'Rape-Provoking Clothing'

[Bud Bundy]

You dont have any choice really. conscientious objection is a joke. Worst things happen in Africa daily but its hilarious the types of things that get the attention of people in the west. Just goes to show how petty the problems in the united states are. You can not respect, it and bytch about women being able to dress like whores as some progressive movement, but it really isnt progressive. Women dressing like sluts really has no bearing on this country overall and whores being suppressed at this point in time is a good thing and better for their safety against rape.

The government will not change to protect whores. Thats a western phenom, saving hoes. The UN is not going in to save them. You arent going in to save them. What will happen though is these chicks will be restricted, have their right to dress provacatively stripped until a time when whores have a more respectable place in society and the complaints of rape victims are as forgettable as the last breath you just took.



I didnt read your posts on weapons banning but what is your opinion on banning assault rifles. Should Americans be able to own them and use them for protection, no questions asked? I ask because im wondering if there are limits to this freedom you believe in.

I respond to this thread topic.

In other topics about the continent i respond in kind.

and go back and read my response on assault rifles but a discussion like that should be in another topic.

 

[Dooby]

Rape attacks decreasing doesn't mean it was a worthwhile measure, even if it does do that. What you're suggesting right now is that it's worth trading freedom for security, which is sad. Crime decreases when there's a militarized police force and less privacy, too. Is it worth it to curtail the freedoms of the victims, instead of trying to curtail the freedom of the criminals? Sad that you bought into this mindset.

Freedom for security is not always a "sad" thing.

 

[Crakface]

I respond to this thread topic.

In other topics about the continent i respond in kind.

and go back and read my response on assault rifles but a discussion like that should be in another topic.

Link me to your assualt rifle response. Or you know, jsut tell me if you feel they should be banned or not.

 

[Crakface]

I'm just saying breh spend less time limp wristing around the dojo showers and posting on the coli and you might be able to form a relationship with the mother of your child.

You arent making any sense. Typical of a emotionally afflicted fakkit.

 

[88m3]

You arent making any sense. Typical of a emotionally afflicted fakkit.

Tried and failed already?

 

[Bud Bundy]

Link me to your assualt rifle response. Or you know, jsut tell me if you feel they should be banned or not.

at this point it would not matter but that is a discussion for another thread.

 

[88m3]

Freedom for security is not always a "sad" thing.

What about freedom of security?

 

[Dooby]

What about freedom of security?

The two words could mean anything...but in the general sense why would you not want security?

 

[The Real]

Freedom for security is not always a "sad" thing.

When it's an unnecessary trade of the vulnerable victim's freedom for security, then it is.

 

[The Real]

My logic operates in reality, yours is in woulda coulda shoulda. Think of a solution within the current government of Swaziland. What are leaders, who think the way they do, going to do? You cant snap a finger and make them think like you. It has taken a long time for people in the US get to where they are. Alot of women who have been raped and beaten have been ignored to get to where we are. You supposed to be TheReal but you talkin fantasies. I think to get to the place you speak of we have to give a middle finger to women who get raped in favor of whores.

Your logic operates in a realm other than reality. It has already been proven that the connection between rape and the clothing of the victim is weak, so continuing to push that point is wishful thinking.

The US got to where it did because women and good men worked hard to change the culture, and that fight isn't even over yet. It didn't get to where it did by banning women's clothes.

 

[Dooby]

When it's an unnecessary trade of the vulnerable victim's freedom for security, then it is.

God forbid...err I meant Huey forbid women dressing modestly instead of slutty...I mean

You can't stop a man from raping a woman if he wants to.

How do you contain his urge?

By decreasing variables that fuel the urge.

What other route could you possibly suggest? It's already illegal to rape.

 

[Crakface]

Your logic operates in a realm other than reality. It has already been proven that the connection between rape and the clothing of the victim is weak, so continuing to push that point is wishful thinking.

The US got to where it did because women and good men worked hard to change the culture, and that fight isn't even over yet. It didn't get to where it did by banning women's clothes.

That isnt an absolute. Giving someone the middle finger doesnt always constitute as a fukk you around the world. It really all depends on the culture that we're talking about. In swaziland scandelously dressed women may actually garner more rape like attention for the simple fact that most women do not dress like that. They are a stark minority and a group that have taken the underworld attire of prostitution and attempted to mainstream it among regular citizens. This can lead to more rapes because the line between whore and normal woman has been blurred.

In your estimation theories and action plans, these women should get raped until enough women dress in whore attire and rape victims pleas are ignored, like they are in the states. When a woman is raped in America, she files a report, maybe they find the guy and she becomes another statistic. The issue of why women are raped is never addressed.

In Swaziland i believe they are attempting to figure out why it is that these women are getting raped and have possibly found the culprit. The mainstreaming of whore attire and as such have attempted to eradicate it.

To you its a bad idea but different forms or order require different plans of actions. America is not a reflection of how the world world works.

 

[The Real]

God forbid...err I meant Huey forbid women dressing modestly instead of slutty...I mean

You can't stop a man from raping a woman if he wants to.

How do you contain his urge?

By decreasing variables that fuel the urge.

What other route could you possibly suggest? It's already illegal to rape.

1. Women dressing modestly or not shouldn't be men's decision, just like men dressing however shouldn't be women's decision.

2. If it is true that you can't stop a man from raping a woman if he wants to (it's not,) then his urge should be contained by actions that prevent his freedom, not the freedom of his potential victims. It's mind-boggling that instead of dealing with him, you want to change everyone else's behavior and make them pay for it instead of him.

 

[Dooby]

1. Women dressing modestly or not shouldn't be men's decision, just like men dressing however shouldn't be women's decision.

2. If it is true that you can't stop a man from raping a woman if he wants to (it's not,) then his urge should be contained by actions that prevent his freedom, not the freedom of his potential victims. It's mind-boggling that instead of dealing with him, you want to change everyone else's behavior and make them pay for it instead of him.

But it is for both sexes. You have to cover your genitals, your a$$hole, and your nipples if you're a female.

But that's a reaction, not an action. When he rapes, he faces consequences, completely understood. I said it's already illegal.

 

[Crakface]

1. Women dressing modestly or not shouldn't be men's decision, just like men dressing however shouldn't be women's decision.

2. If it is true that you can't stop a man from raping a woman if he wants to (it's not,) then his urge should be contained by actions that prevent his freedom, not the freedom of his potential victims. It's mind-boggling that instead of dealing with him, you want to change everyone else's behavior and make them pay for it instead of him.

1. Well it shouldnt be but, it is a mans decision in Swaziland. Thats how they plan on protecting their women and their culture, by modifying the way they dress. Just like lawmakers in Florida who outlawed saggy pants. I mean in America, regulations on attire exist and you eat that, why cant you eat this?

2. Im sure if they can prove that he was involved in a non consensual affair, they will punish the man at the same time. In the meantime, Swaziland feels its necessary to also modify the way women dress to maintain the respect necessary to avoid rapes in their country. They are not at a point culturally where women who dress like whores are part of the mainstream. In Swaziland, this is not respectable attire. You're looking at things from the perspective of a man whos been conditioned to see scandelous clothing as good, where other cultures, do not.