When presented with very limited options... Evangelicals (basically the bible thumpers of Christianity)
So I'm not understanding the point of this very stupid and flawed study...... it is to simply point a finger or make fun or Church goers? Is it to single out Evangelicals?
you did a pretty good job
try to discredit a study for being hostile towards a population by insulting the population yourself brehs
Whatever the purpose - I'm sure that it will ignore that fact that there are ways in which that 35% are 100% correct.
breh, anyone that thinks schizophrenia can be cured by bible study needs to catch a johnny cage split punch to the gonads.
But I'm curious to know, what ways the 35% are 100% correct? Is this an oversimplification of flexible philosophies like the importance of family or personal strength, tailored to meet religious guidelines?
I'm confused by this statement. Are you projecting your criticism of non theistic beliefs by making a blanket statement for religion. Or are you in fact defending certain individual Evangelical beliefs that bring them closer to the God as 100% correct?