Stripper allegedly turns down 1 million to not have Paul George's baby

calh45

Cal
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,451
Reputation
1,988
Daps
40,515
rajic.jpg

NBA Indiana Pacers’ superstar player, Paul George, is reportedly being sued by Daniela Rajic for full custody of their 2-month-old daughter and for an unspecified amount of child care. Rajic, a former stripper, is alleging that George is too busy on the court to be a parent, according to the New York Post’s Page Six.

Olivia George, who was born on May 1 at a New York hospital, has never even met her dad, according to Rajic, who lives in Queens. In addition, George is not named as the Father on her birth certificate.

George, who lives in Indianapolis and is expected to bank at least $3.3 million this year, already had a positive DNA test in relation to the child, according to Rajic. A spokesman for the superstar hoopster contends, however, that there is yet another paternity test that will offer the case “legal confirmation.”

George has reportedly verified his paternity verbally, and according to the suit, he “has paid various medical and other expenses” related to the pregnancy.

George has released a statement with regards to Rajic’s legal filing, according to Page Six, stating, “I will fully embrace my responsibilities.”

http://newsone.com/3026053/paul-george-daniela-rajic/

He could drop that she's too busy in the strip club to take care of the child. I pray to baby Jesus that he ends up with full custody. These judges gotta stop handing over all this cash to these strumpets. They know what these women are doing. Why are they enabling it?
 

Ron Mexico

Superstar
Joined
Aug 30, 2013
Messages
8,903
Reputation
1,808
Daps
57,523
He could drop that she's too busy in the strip club to take care of the child. I pray to baby Jesus that he ends up with full custody. These judges gotta stop handing over all this cash to these strumpets. They know what these women are doing. Why are they enabling it?
Only ones enabling it are the idiots like Paul George who get them pregnant.
 

Tony D'Amato

It's all about the inches
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
61,333
Reputation
-10,956
Daps
146,395
Reppin
Inches
He could drop that she's too busy in the strip club to take care of the child. I pray to baby Jesus that he ends up with full custody. These judges gotta stop handing over all this cash to these strumpets. They know what these women are doing. Why are they enabling it?
Pretty sure the nut he dropped in her was her retirement fund. She aint gettin on that pole no mo :usure:
 

calh45

Cal
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,451
Reputation
1,988
Daps
40,515
Only ones enabling it are the idiots like Paul George who get them pregnant.
Pretty sure the nut he dropped in her was her retirement fund. She aint gettin on that pole no mo :usure:

This is exactly what I'm saying. It's child SUPPORT. It ain't money for her to sit on her ass for the rest of her life. Just getting pregnant by a dude shouldn't be a fukking meal ticket. They should change the law to require that the baby mom needs to make the amount of money she's asking for.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-559
Daps
15,338
Reppin
WestMidWest
This is exactly what I'm saying. It's child SUPPORT. It ain't money for her to sit on her ass for the rest of her life. Just getting pregnant by a dude shouldn't be a fukking meal ticket. They should change the law to require that the baby mom needs to make the amount of money she's asking for.

nah.

Any dude with money who hasn't made a deposit at the sperm bank, followed by the doc visit for the vasec treatment, deserves their financial future to be dictated by the courts
 

Tony D'Amato

It's all about the inches
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
61,333
Reputation
-10,956
Daps
146,395
Reppin
Inches
This is exactly what I'm saying. It's child SUPPORT. It ain't money for her to sit on her ass for the rest of her life. Just getting pregnant by a dude shouldn't be a fukking meal ticket. They should change the law to require that the baby mom needs to make the amount of money she's asking for.
The thing is they take into account who the child's father is. And they seem to believe the child should live the lifestyle commensurate with it's father's wealth. The bish is gonna get atleast 10gs a month :wow:
 

calh45

Cal
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,451
Reputation
1,988
Daps
40,515
The thing is they take into account who the child's father is. And they seem to believe the child should live the lifestyle commensurate with it's father's wealth. The bish is gonna get atleast 10gs a month :wow:

Legal precedent changes based on how smart lawyers argue. If I was a lawyer I'd come at the judge this way. I'd say that the CHILD's lifestyle should be commensurate with the father's wealth, but that doesn't necessarily have to include the mother. If they say I'd need to pay 10k per month then I'd counter and say I'd want to hire an independent auditor to confirm the money is spent on the child and not the mother's needs. I'd basically set it up like a trust rather than just giving up money that ain't monitored. If ole girl complains that she needs a car then she ain't getting a mercedes with my money. No LV diaper bags. No club tabs. No spa treatments. The mom needs to pay half of the rent.The CHILD should be able to benefit not the moms. It shouldn't allow the mom to lay about all day.
 

GunRanger

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
30,466
Reputation
4,487
Daps
100,840
The thing is they take into account who the child's father is. And they seem to believe the child should live the lifestyle commensurate with it's father's wealth. The bish is gonna get atleast 10gs a month :wow:
Which is stupid. You don't have to maintain a certain lifestyle during a relationship, but the court wants you to do so after
 

street heat

merchant of death
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
12,209
Reputation
-2,926
Daps
29,642
Reppin
NULL
women aint shyt, but i dont blame them near as much as the courts that allow this bullshyt.
 

Tony D'Amato

It's all about the inches
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
61,333
Reputation
-10,956
Daps
146,395
Reppin
Inches
Legal precedent changes based on how smart lawyers argue. If I was a lawyer I'd come at the judge this way. I'd say that the CHILD's lifestyle should be commensurate with the father's wealth, but that doesn't necessarily have to include the mother. If they say I'd need to pay 10k per month then I'd counter and say I'd want to hire an independent auditor to confirm the money is spent on the child and not the mother's needs. I'd basically set it up like a trust rather than just giving up money that ain't monitored. If ole girl complains that she needs a car then she ain't getting a mercedes with my money. No LV diaper bags. No club tabs. No spa treatments. The mom needs to pay half of the rent.The CHILD should be able to benefit not the moms. It shouldn't allow the mom to lay about all day.
I hear u breh, but I dont feel sorry for these n1ggaz. They should be smarter. Even Fif got got by a hoe. These n1ggaz refuse to use that latex.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
146,725
Reputation
26,259
Daps
491,937
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
Legal precedent changes based on how smart lawyers argue. If I was a lawyer I'd come at the judge this way. I'd say that the CHILD's lifestyle should be commensurate with the father's wealth, but that doesn't necessarily have to include the mother. If they say I'd need to pay 10k per month then I'd counter and say I'd want to hire an independent auditor to confirm the money is spent on the child and not the mother's needs. I'd basically set it up like a trust rather than just giving up money that ain't monitored. If ole girl complains that she needs a car then she ain't getting a mercedes with my money. No LV diaper bags. No club tabs. No spa treatments. The mom needs to pay half of the rent.The CHILD should be able to benefit not the moms. It shouldn't allow the mom to lay about all day.

CHURCH.

Or better yet, GET fukkIN CUSTODY. STDWADE GAVE nikkaZ THE BLUEPRINT!
 
Top