Stimulus & Bailout Watch Thread

DJ Paul's Arm

Veteran
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
21,779
Reputation
6,256
Daps
124,477
Reppin
Cali
$600 :laff:

Dude cut a deal with himself :mjlol:





















71UgBNx7WmL.jpg
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
46,834
Reputation
3,954
Daps
70,962
Reppin
Michigan
basically when Twiiter and FB flag Trump's tweets..

Under section 230 they could ban his social media accounts once he leaves office
Section 230 means that within reason Facebook and Twitter aren't held accountable for stuff their users post. Without it they would be held accountable for anything posted on their sites. It would effectively legislate them out of existence.
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
41,691
Reputation
21,590
Daps
130,380
Section 230 means that within reason Facebook and Twitter aren't held accountable for stuff their users post. Without it they would be held accountable for anything posted on their sites. It would effectively legislate them out of existence.

Even if they remove S.230, they can add it back in later. Especially if they win GA.
 

KillbertArenas

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,426
Reputation
-350
Daps
14,427
Reppin
PG - Maryland
Section 230 means that within reason Facebook and Twitter aren't held accountable for stuff their users post. Without it they would be held accountable for anything posted on their sites. It would effectively legislate them out of existence.

Right - thats why they were flagging Trump's tweets..and were in line to ban him
 

KillbertArenas

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,426
Reputation
-350
Daps
14,427
Reppin
PG - Maryland
Section 230 means that within reason Facebook and Twitter aren't held accountable for stuff their users post. Without it they would be held accountable for anything posted on their sites. It would effectively legislate them out of existence.

This is why 230 was in the way for him

 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
46,834
Reputation
3,954
Daps
70,962
Reppin
Michigan
Right - thats why they were flagging Trump's tweets..and were in line to ban him
They don't have to moderate or flag his post. They choose to do so. Ever with section 230 there in immense pressure on both sites to police their content. Trump's beef is he doesn't want them to police his content or anything he agrees with. Repealing section 230 isn't going to help him there at all. All that's gonna do is mean that Facebook and Twitter will be held liable for the content their users post. That means they can't really exist because the lawsuits would become unmanageable.
 

KillbertArenas

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,426
Reputation
-350
Daps
14,427
Reppin
PG - Maryland
They don't have to moderate or flag his post. They choose to do so.

Of course they "choose to" - he's the President that regularly posted stuff that wouldve violated the twitter accounts you or I have. Twitter and FB allowed him to violate so they began flagging him after users began complaining...

Once he stepped down - they were going to ban him
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
46,834
Reputation
3,954
Daps
70,962
Reppin
Michigan
This is why 230 was in the way for him


He can't really legislate moderation of a private site like that. Twitter and Facebook are under no legal obligation to allow him to post there. Like any other private citizen he should have to follow their rules if he wants to use their site.
 

KillbertArenas

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,426
Reputation
-350
Daps
14,427
Reppin
PG - Maryland
He can't really legislate moderation of a private site like that. Twitter and Facebook are under no legal obligation to allow him to post there. Like any other private citizen he should have to follow their rules if he wants to use their site.

Welcome to the party..

This conversation has been going on for like 3 years
 
Top