Yes. But I don't recall anyone saying "you vote for us and you'll get $1400 to add to that other $600".Yes and that is what was promised.
Can you post a few Biden tweets or Ossoff rallys where they do some arithmetic for us?
Yes. But I don't recall anyone saying "you vote for us and you'll get $1400 to add to that other $600".Yes and that is what was promised.
"Manchin wants no checks for individuals making more than $75,000 per year, or couples making $150,000, his office said. He wants the amount to start phasing down at $50,000 per person, or $100,000 per couple."
Link: Senate Democrats split on who should receive $1,400 checks
Again, you aren’t very clever. Even now, you’ve decided to imagine some “exposure” instead of providing any evidence to support your point. Your arrogance is always your demise as you are used to debating the TLR doofus.You're a clown and have been exposed as such many times. You don't have a basic understanding of how government works. Don't @ me because it always ends badly for you and always will.
He can’t and won’t. He will do a TLR dance around admitting he is wrong.Yes. But I don't recall anyone saying "you vote for us and you'll get $1400 to add to that other $600".
Can you post a few Biden tweets or Ossoff rallys where they do some arithmetic for us?
He can’t and won’t. He will do a TLR dance around admitting he is wrong.
Like i said, i dont believe him. Make him put up or shut up.
If the dems run on cutting the checks, and then they means test the checks even more after the fact, they have to know they will lose the next couple of elections at all levels. They arent that dumb. Its all posturing. They should do the right thing and be the party for the entire middle class.
Why don’t you point to when Ossof, Warnock and Biden said 600+1400 during the run-up to the Georgia Elections?please provide anyone in Democratic leadership saying $2600
Now the Biden White House is talking about means testing that figure, which would mean they misled on whatever the total is.
You can debate this argument with yourself.Ok.. still looking for that $2600..
I didn’t miss it, it was irrelevant to my point about any means testing further misleading voters.You missed the post where i said they shouldn't alter the eligibility and if they do that would be a broken promise to many. I agree with that.
Why are you creating your own argument to debate against?
What is this silly semantic shyt?